Riz Khan- Danica McKellar Math- 28 August 07
Top Comments
All Comments (82)
-
@oscarwildone only time i aggree with a non-american about english it sounds like meth to me
-
I am so happy she's so good at math! Because it means she will always measure the right ingredients and prepare the best amount of times and temperatures when cooking my food in the kitchen!
-
What a relief, there are far hotter women in America who actually have brains but the same cannot be said about the Lindsays, Britneys and Paris of the world.
-
fuck she is one lucky person....has the life everyone lusts after
-
Ah come on, women can't do maths. They have a brain the size of a squirrel, I saw it on a nature programme. She probably does sex to get people to give here high results. Her theorem is "accesorisation and handbag multiplicity for faux leather and pvc models at Top Shop".
-
I'm sure she's despised by republicans.
-
@IGaveYouAVirus math is the coolest!
-
what theorem did she prove?
-
...and instead the American (Corporate Controlled) mainstream media focuses on stupid whore celebrities like Paris Hilton and Brittany Spears. SAD!
This chick is not only far more attractive, but deserves this attention a lot more.
Just think... Little girls might become interested in math and science instead of sluttery and drug abuse!
ahhhh Danica, if only there were more women like you in this world...
-
She has an interesting cultural background-Portuguese and Scottish. The ultimate catch with her beauty and brains.
She Is Just Trying To Get More People Interested In Math So Fuck Off...The World Is Filled With Too Many Retards Already So Fuck Off And Die Haters....I Thinks Girls Should Go Into Math....The Only Kind Of Girls I Like Are The Ones That Can Solve A Partial Differential Equation..
IGaveYouAVirus 3 years ago 6
1. She would be a good mathematician, maybe not a "brilliant" one.
2. She is using her ability to influence the world around her in a positive way.
Encouraging more women to be interested in math is not a bad thing, nor will it be hostile to Science, if anything, it would (should) do the opposite.
schr4nz 3 years ago 6