The GEnx Engine: Works Better, Makes Less Noise and Emissions
Loading...
Loading...
2:12
GE Aviation - Aircraft Engine History and Technology | Jet Engineby GEreports83,925 views- 2:42
GEnx: the Next Generation of Commercial Jet Enginesby GEreports11,542 views
- 2:42
Setting the Record for Jet Engine Performance: the GE90 Engineby GEreports31,292 views
- 2:07
GE Aviation - Aircraft Engine Design & Construction Time-lapseby GEreports45,005 views
- 3:44
Genx VS. Trent 1000by ivanchiang82723,962 views
- 2:07
GEnx: Two Minute Engineby GEAviation2,115 views
- 3:33
Engine GEnX 2B-67by ursjan2,991 views
- 0:34
TRENT 900 DESTRUCTION TEST !by dutchvolvofan62,589 views
- 3:46
GE Honda Aero Engines Introductionby HONDARA10824,750 views
- 2:04
GEnx-2B Music Video (2008)by GEAviation5,359 views
- 9:34
Last Malev flight from Budapest to New Yorkby richey63913,163 views
- 3:40
General Electric Biggest Jet Engine for B-777by raminloo252,042 views
- 2:05
Test for turbofan engineby nbhgfh33,470 views
- 2:07
Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental Starts its Enginesby Altumkell16,492 views
- 3:40
Testing the new GE-90 Engineby AircraftMechanix65,789 views
- 0:44
General Electric ecomagination Commercial - Frogby thinkadblog28,405 views
- 3:45
Boeing 787 Trent 1000 enginesby autoonline391,022 views
- 2:48
Low flying aircraft - engine soundsby tidnab200871,973 views
- 1:28
Yak-1 engine start-up, or, 'Butch makes some noise'by Clashmaker60,659 views
@05u16hep CF stuff when broken apart do not make ballistic penetrative shards, as other metal based materials do, they are so light they lose energy and are unable to penetrate anything, thats why it is used in F1/WRC racecars
nakazatoGTR 10 months ago
@legox50 Trust me GE engines are not 3 spool!! All their engines have always been 2 shaft, same as RR has always been 3 shaft. look at their animations and stuff. and they would put 2 shaft as it is lighter and less maintainance cost. RR used 3 shaft to increase efficiency among other reasons. I do think the carbon fibre fan blades look amazing though!
05u16hep 1 year ago
@05u16hep
-I'm not very sure about static electricity build up.
-The GE engines already has 3 rotor shafts... why would they put less?
-Your right about RR making the wide chords, GE just improved them.
-Carbom fiber blades do not snap, they bend. Either that, or they develop tiny cracks that are held together by the carbon fibers in the blade, which cannot break that easily
-Your 100% correct about both companies's pro's and con's
legox50 1 year ago
@legox50 Carbon fibre fan blades = prone to static electricity buildup + rapid discharge, prone to 'snaping' and releasing shards into the engine in a bird strike rather than just bending.
RR are 3 shaft making much more efficient and less prone to stall.
RR were fisrt to bring out wide chord fan blades or 'big' ones as you put.
Both companies are leading edge, both have advantages, both have disadvantages
05u16hep 1 year ago
WOOT!!!! I LOVE THIS COMPANY!!!!!
Comparison between Rolls-Royce and GE engines
Rolls-Royce: Titanium fan blade=heavy
GE: Carbon fiber=200+ lighter and less fan blades; bigger fan blades; lower RPM making it more quiet; etc. (Too many pros to say)
legox50 1 year ago
GE Caledonian Exclusive overhaul facility for GEnx
santoichinkie 2 years ago