@Fapsamup The Shroud is dated from 1500? No it's not. According to? The C-14 date that attempted to place the age of the Shroud within the last 500 to 700 years has long since been disproven. Even if only by blood tests, which verify that the blood on the Cloth of Oviedo is the same on the Shroud, and the Cloth of Oviedo, which came from Jerusalem has been in Spain since 600 AD. Even the Prey Manuscript circa 1100 AD predates those incorrect tests. The Shroud is ancient and authentic.
They shoudln't use the name Jesus so often in this documentary. It is still not proved that it is actually Jesus on the Shroud. And the shroud is dated from 1500. There were manny people who were crusified to rememorate the crusifixion of Jesus. It is still today a tradition in many cultures.
Aby cokolwiek porównywać należy być pewnym, że 2 porównywalne elementy są prawdziwe. Nie porównywać jakiegoś sztucznego modelu twarzy do jakiś wyobrażeń, jak powstała twarz Jezusa na tym płótnie. Aby być pewnym i porównywać należy wziąść ten 2d obraz i porównać z 3d twarzą Jezusa z Manoppello!!!
jesus is very handsome
kenclint18 10 months ago
if you put a definitive diagnosis, you are either an atheist or Jew or Muslim, or totally ignorant and the ignorant idiot
sobolewski1968 11 months ago
@Fapsamup The Shroud is dated from 1500? No it's not. According to? The C-14 date that attempted to place the age of the Shroud within the last 500 to 700 years has long since been disproven. Even if only by blood tests, which verify that the blood on the Cloth of Oviedo is the same on the Shroud, and the Cloth of Oviedo, which came from Jerusalem has been in Spain since 600 AD. Even the Prey Manuscript circa 1100 AD predates those incorrect tests. The Shroud is ancient and authentic.
NilDesperandum777 11 months ago
tylko po co w ogóle marnowac czas na dochodzenie tego jak onwyglądal przeciez to nie ma znaczenie
Bboy123456789ify 11 months ago
Latest computer tech from april 2010 that blows
Kawp123 1 year ago
Wouldnt surprise me if someone takes a DNA sample from the dried blood and creates a Clone.Technology is there today.
dogsandkennels 1 year ago
They shoudln't use the name Jesus so often in this documentary. It is still not proved that it is actually Jesus on the Shroud. And the shroud is dated from 1500. There were manny people who were crusified to rememorate the crusifixion of Jesus. It is still today a tradition in many cultures.
Fapsamup 1 year ago
Ten film to bzdura!
Aby cokolwiek porównywać należy być pewnym, że 2 porównywalne elementy są prawdziwe. Nie porównywać jakiegoś sztucznego modelu twarzy do jakiś wyobrażeń, jak powstała twarz Jezusa na tym płótnie. Aby być pewnym i porównywać należy wziąść ten 2d obraz i porównać z 3d twarzą Jezusa z Manoppello!!!
JezusSlave 1 year ago
God, Our Lord and King Jesus Christ let bless You!!!
It`s the TRUE and everyone should compare that 3d picture(Manoppello) to the 2d. shroud of Turin to be sure not some fictional models!!!
Poor face of God beaten to death for our sins!
How people can say they don`t love Him-they dont have heart?
JezusSlave 1 year ago