Demolition Waves

Kind of explosive for a pancake theory, don't you think?

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• 911
• wtc
• demolition

[zoskiaist]

there is a lot of disinformation out there on 911. if something looks like nonsense but appears next to compelling information you know ure looking at misinfo or disinfo. There are entire sites that sound technical but are really meant to make people think 911 truth is nonsense. with domains that almost match real 911t sites.

Buildings do not fall through themselves. The N tower was hit 10-15 floors from the roof. You can see the explosives in some clips:

gravity>>? watch?v=9nc5_5IJek8

[zoskiaist]

@SuesDaytona

unfortunately there is a mountain of highly compelling evidence that makes the explosives hypothesis an inescapable conclusion.

a few are; The speed & symmetry of all 3 tower destructions (1.2&7), wtc7's freefall implosion, the level of destruction to the towers, (pulverized concrete, 1100 people unaccounted for, complete destruction of the massive 47 core columns (from gravity??) 99 days fires that would not go out. the squibs, testimony of witnesses hearing explosives..

[tuzmor]

This video is posted 3 years ago.

YouTube says that it only has:

6 ratings, 4,968 views and 16 comments?

REALLY?

That is:

- 1 rating every 6 months

- 1 view every 6 hours and 23 minutes

- 1 comment every 82 days

REALLY!?

I just favorite and rated it 5* - how many ratings does it have now?

[SuesDaytona]

I started to think about this a lot last night. Could it if there was detonation, Bombs were planted by someone who were the terrorist ahead time, To make sure both of the buildings came down and maybe others. Because if you think about it, they failed the first time to bring it down what was it 1993?

[SuesDaytona]

When the History Channel showed the Documentaries, A fireman said he heard the building buckle and creak. I believe the jet fuel and high intense heat did cause it to collapse. I don't believe in any conspiracy. How do you know that some these intense sparks or something that looked like detonation wasn't electricity.

[nickv11763]

hmmm jeff king who teaches from M.I.T must know nothing either because he seems to think the same but he wouldn't know anything would he, he just teaches on the subject of building structure before you start making fun of people do some research because now you have no ground to stand on look him up on youtube also look up the melting point of steel and see that jet feul only burns at half the temp. soo why was there melting steel weeks later

[gfemg]

You are an uneducated MORON - You have no concept of Physics - you have NO Credibility because you have a Severe LACK of INTELLIGENCE and therefore your point of view is WORTHLESS - You are a Total ASSHOLE and a Complete INSULT to all Intelligent people on earth. We have NO INTEREST in your WORTHLESS Opinion !!!

[westerling69]

snap crackle pop ... that baby was cooking off like a string of black cat fire crackers all the way down turning the main support colum into dust Heeeheee..pecker head bush cock suckin bastards... you are retards

[RichardBrennekeC]

The majority of the jet fuel burned off durring the crash. And the speed of the implosion seems very quick. I cant explain that. The collapse looks like a hot knife spliting down soft butter.

[Misanthrope0607]

if it hadn't been a demolition the colapse wouldn't have been near perfectly vertical. the side of the impact would have collapsed first and the collapse would not have been completely symetrical from top to bottom