ACE Army Airship Blimp Dirigible UAV RC
Uploader Comments (pilotcoolbiz)
Top Comments
-
Wow WA4RRN, way to play into the dumbass soldier stereotype.
-
Hi folks, That last comment about being difficult to shoot down is true, as they above small arms and the IR signiture is no good for a missile. Big news at present is the US Army LEMV contract for Northrop Grumman and partner Hybrid Air Vehicles in Cardingtom England. For more info try the following sites, HAV: 3w dot hybridairvehicles dot nett but one t ABC: 3w dot airshipblimp dot kom GASBAGS: 3w dot airship dot me
Regards JB
All Comments (37)
-
Very nice! Airships **definitely** have a place in the military of today. Very cheap to operate, can loiter in an area for a long time.
-
@Thetrutv really
-
@drewboy108 Really?
-
@Thetrutv the helium gas expands and the envelope could explode
-
What happens if it gos heigher than 10.000 ALT?
-
These small aerostats are not much use in a combat zone as they can't fly high enough to avoid groundfire, their payload is very limited and worst of all they have limited endurance. The US Army has ordered the real thing from Northrop Grumman and Hybrid Air Vehicles. Regards JB ( 3w hybridairship dotty net )
-
@Raguleader Been a long time since I watched that video! Sure, in any "uncontested" airspace, it can serve some sort of useful purposes. In any war zone, though, ALL "space" will be contested!
Military communications, even local tactical, are hardly at issue now. 40 years ago, in NAM, different ballgame. I would have traded both testicles in return for our present GPS system back then...the ARTY Dudes used to scare hell out of us!!!
BOB...A Co, 1/8, 1st Cav Div, 69-70
-
@Proudamerican2000 The ladies love Call of Duty
-
@Proudamerican2000 Don't really need weapons or good looks to be very handy. Just look at the C-130, one of the ugliest unarmed planes in the western world, and also one of the most useful and versatile.
-
@WA4RRN Well, the idea is that you wouldn't use it in contested airspace. You'd gain air dominance first, and then you could use this to vastly improve your communications coverage over the antenna you could put on trucks or soldiers' backpacks. You don't need to build a tower, and you don't need to burn a lot of fuel keeping a plane up in the air doing the same job.
What's its intended use? Over hostile territory it looks to be an excellent target practice device for the enemy...
WA4RRN 3 years ago
com link
pilotcoolbiz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
PilotCoolBiz...Ya know, after about 10 minutes o' ruminatin' over your dumbassed bullshit, I'd say you B dangerous to the security of our Military...
WA4RRN 3 years ago
So sorry you feel that way. However, if you think you can hit a 100' airship that is flying at 8,000 feet AGL, and standing off 50 clicks, go for it. I am trying to be as polite as possible by saying... "You have no idea what you are talking about". Pilotcoolbiz USMC 0311
pilotcoolbiz 3 years ago
And after thinking about it for 10 minutes myself... You my Marine Brother, are the dumbass here. It would take more small arms fire than a platoon could even carry. (And yes, an M-60 would be considered small arms fire). The BDA Studies are impressive. And the most obvious reason to use this technology is that none of our pilots risk their lives in combat. You can buy this ship for the cost of a few loads of missles on an F-16. Wake up dude, and see the bigger picture.
pilotcoolbiz 3 years ago
coulden't aircraft just do that??? They are faster and could climb higher. the only thing blimps have over aircraft is that aircraft need a runway
eventress 4 years ago
The one thing that you are over looking is the constant loiter times. This ship can stay on station for over 30 hours. Let's see another type of aircraft do that. And at a very low cost.
pilotcoolbiz 4 years ago