NASA rant #3

NASA sucks, but I still love it, which is why I'm so pissed.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• rocket
• Nasa

[circepal]

The rockets haven't even looked different in design over the years. In the private sector they have to constantly make new designs. New computers, new cars, new tvs. Im so sick of people feeding into NASA it reminds me of feudalism they labor to only benefit a few.

[circepal]

So you're saying only astronauts can go out into space? Then you throw hominems at this guy.

[circepal]

@bigjim32 @bigjim32 How long is it going to take for the common people to go out in space. When you want something for EVERYONE there seems to be a benefit for all mankind. Only astronauts can go to space and it's been how long? How long did it take for people to benefit from the airplane after it was invented? How long did it take for people to benefit from the lightbulb? How long did it take for people to benefit from the automobile?

[LouistheHedgehog]

I think you're confusing ramjets with pulse detonation jets.

[dude58677]

Everyone benefits from commercial space tourism, including NASA astronauts who can fly missions after they retire from NASA.

Without commercial space tourism, what is the fun in cheering on other people to go to space when you can buy a ticket at Virgin Galactic for SpaceShip Two and SpaceShip Three?

[meltinmym0uth]

remeber that shit when were stuck and burning from global warming fuck money dont let that green shit enlsave mankind

[wspaceport]

For starters, your 1/24 scale GT-II is WAY out of scale. Doesn't even come close to looking like a Titan III-M with a Gemini/MOL uooer stage either. Second, PopSci isn't exactly the greatest source of factual news (witness their earlier prognostications that NEVER panned out, like the "F-19 Stealth Fighter"). Finally, after viewing these appropriately titled "rants," I've safely determined that you're unfortunately all boost and no payload.

[mindlobster]

I have the same issue of Popular Science and I hated it... It only seemed to support the army and it struggle to conquer and foul everything and it appears that space is next. The current issue showcases future technologies to spy and control our population. Popular Science has hone to hell in the same basket as NASA. You can not go through one of their issues with out seeing an add for the fucking ARMY. It's supposed to be a magazine for intellectuals not for drop out teenagers.

[martimus1000]

NASA budget = $16.8B;; AF Budget = $105.9B, (FY '07) technology cost's money ...

[minaton66]

NASA lies about Ufos and the real structure of our World and the real technological state.Many Members

are Freemasons and Zionist,they are very haughty.Nasa is a corrupt organisation with more military aspect as

civil use.They destroy our Atmosphere our Nature (ecological system) with the old rocket engine.