Jupiter is an Electron - The Reality Scale Constant S & The New Theory on Relativity and Gravity - The Unification of Physics & Theory of Everything
Uploader Comments (mainframexi)
Video Responses
All Comments (88)
-
Nice
-
@BarryDread123 in regards to speed of information, my theory states that as an objects approaches the speed of light, it contracts and scales down to a quantum object where the passage of time for this object accelerates considerably from our reference point but unnoticed the object itself; physics the same in all inertial frames of reference. If this object were a star, it's expelled light photons will travel much, much faster than what we consider photons because they'd also be scaled.
-
@BarryDread123 in my reply to @andybrimmer529 I state a possible relation to GRT. The key is the realization that all matter expels energy in the form of various scales and velocities of quantized energy, or quantized matter, which manifests as heat and light across the full spectrum. This expelled energy exerts an inertial thrust in all directions if a planetoid, which is a push against space itself which manifests as a warping of space as the spatial pressure differential attracts objects.
-
@andybrimmer529 actually the theory states that objects that have the same mass and density would repel each other topologically, adhering to a topological wave theory. The exact mechanism is unknown, as it is somewhat for gravity, but I suspect that expelled energy from the matter objects with the similar or exact mass and density overcomes gravitational attraction of warped space, from classical GRT. This defines a form of cosmological charge interaction, akin to quantum charge.
You know i've thought about something like that, but object of similar mass and density do not repel each other in fact they do the opposite... and the way you derive your values is borderline numerology... but still this would add a dimention of depth to the universe... thats what ive thought about...
titubakom 6 months ago
@titubakom Many others have also thought of this mainly because of Rutherford and Bohr. I don't believe how I derived this matches any definition of numerology because I used a logical process for selecting Beryllium and I'm not assigning arbitrary values to things but using well known existing radii data for Br atom and the Solar System and deriving a scale value ratio. This video is old. My latest work explores the topological mechanism for gravity.
mainframexi 6 months ago
I still adhere to the postulation that gravity, in analogy between atomic and cosmological, that mass and gravity acts like charge and electromagnetism at the cosmological scale, but does not require the arbitrary sign of positive or negative charge or mass to define attraction or repulsion as a description of a characteristic that is perhaps more understandable as in objects of different density react with each other differently than we currently believe, perhaps more so at the planet scale.
mainframexi 6 months ago
What is known is that there is an attractive mechanism between masses but there is also repulsion as in photons/quanta/energy expelled from all matter/planets and which collide with other matter/planets which cause a repulsive force upon collision. My contention is that gravity is more topologically is more complex than what we think. Also, the Cavendish experiment does not use iron spheres of the same size or spheres of the different densities to determine the full spectrum of interaction.
mainframexi 6 months ago
My theory is a unification theory between cosmological physics and quantum physics. This is my claim.
mainframexi 1 year ago
Just a quick post, my theory is not a theory of everything. I included this in the title only because there is an exuberant interest in theories of everything. I believe a theory of everything can never be achieved. A theory of everything would have to explain why I like music and hot Italian sandwiches plus explain what the mysterious dark matter/energy is in a simple and elegant fashion. I do believe all of science will evolve to a better state of understanding from where it is now.
mainframexi 1 year ago