Top Comments
All Comments (407)
-
Dx 10 looks a little bit more cartoon-ish ... and i tend to like that more
-
this tool is a big fail! only for noobs. 3D Mark 11 is sooo much better!
-
Great video :)
Try and sync it up for the nerds like me who want to compare identical screens please :P
-
how do i change from dx 10 to dx 11 or download it or what ever !
-
to be 100% honest, dx10 actually look a little bit better to me...
-
Do i need to take an appointement at my ophthalmologist? I find that dx10 is sharper, less blurry than dx11. Although globally, dx11 does look a little bit bettter, more realistic.
The best example is the paved streets at 1:40 and in other parts : with dx10 it's flat, whereas with dx11 you can see the "bumps" (on the rooftops also).
However, I don't know if this is worth spending 300€ on a new GPU.
-
directx10 is better lol
-
@kingyuhi010 The shingles on the roof look like a normal house would look like, DX10 = Flat. The rocks on the paths and the walls look like they are popping out, that's depth, babay. The DX10 has better quality, gamma mostly, but that's because the uploader has to compress the image of the DX 11 one, if you read the description.
-
sorry for being noob but i just dont see any different.., lol
they both look good to me., and there are times when i see dx10 better based on the video.
im getting a gtx460 ., and see dx11 upfront.,
-
"85 likes, 58 dislikes"
lol the inverse!
@Flam3o There is a difference, the DX10 render is quite flat. Comparing that to DX11 the render has depth, and shows excessive detail on each individual rock positioned in the wall. To you and myself the difference is only small, but for some people that difference can take them into a world of extreme gameplay, that they see as a necessity. I on the other hand, don't mind so much :)
leighb0103 1 year ago 24
Yes but Benchmarks are pretty much useless.
Games is all the counts
CobraGMW2 1 year ago 14