Contrails -Experimental Aircraft

Test Flight

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Northrop
• lockheed
• aircraft

[nixter1nixter1]

Never mind the contrail nonsense, Experimental craft are MUCH more interesting, super high quality camera work there Bry, good job, and what the heck is that smaller one? Where do you live again? Are you anywhere close to a military base? I think we just found out where Area 51 has been moved to. FIVE STARS!!!

[bry3500]

Really great to hear from you nixter.. Australia,

I'm sick of military bases mate to be quite honest..

They're here

[its1984]

Your 'flame ufos' are chemtrails. It happens most nights, when they are spraying; The sun's angle turns the trails bright orange.

That is not to say that there are no ufo's.. I've seen them in Washington, D.C. One floated around the sprayed clouds for nearly 10 minutes, before beginning to ascend. I had to go back into my building, this is the only reason I lost sight of it.

[bry3500]

Well aware of the Chemtrail menace - Thanks for your comment

[WhiteGangster400]

It's a UAV

[lazer1million]

Did they successfully intercept E.T.?

[MrEiriku]

@HumildeHumano yourasstrails

[RoninHawk]

@RetroFishman - Wrong again. The B-2 was photographed plenty from ALL angles. The rear outlets are not under wraps, nor was it ever really under wraps. Look, once an aircraft becomes introduced to the public, it is essentailly being declassified at that point, and so is the rear exterior. No youre not seeing some grey box at the rear of the test plane, because at :48 they show clear A/A footage of the aircraft's rear anyway - up close. Youre just seeing video with poor resolutution.

[RetroFishman]

@RoninHawk OK it was Northrop but the rear of the plane was parked in such away as photos could not be taken of the exhaust propulsion area, ive seen it on several occasions. and you can clearly see a grey square mask at the rear of that test plane to obscure any trade secrets that went into it. Its masked for a reason. Today it may be possible to get close up photos of the rear outlets of a stealth bomber but still think they keep that under wraps.

[RoninHawk]

@mattkingnz - Youre a complete fucking moron. You dipshits look at an aircraft thats gone out of focus, and call it a fake airplane, or a shape-shifting airplane. Shut up with your stupid shit.

[RoninHawk]

@RetroFishman - Wrong. Boeing did not build the stealth bomber. Northrop did. And even on the day of introduction, it was photographed plenty from all angles.

[RoninHawk]

@jasong19711 - the other is a Boeing UCAV.

[mattkingnz]

both crafts are holographic projectors the one on the left is projecting a shape and the one on the right isnt projecting , they use this technology for chemtrailing .. check out ..' holographic planes'

[RetroFishman]

Notice the rectangular censor mask at rear of experimental craft. When Boeing first displayed the stealth bomber to the public, photographing it from the rear was next to imposible as it would reveal certain engineering secrets they dont want the general public noing about. Dureing public presentations it was always well protected from the rear at air shows, where the most dedicated photographer could not get a shot of the propulsion outlets or rear of plane. Whats behind that grey patch?