OBAMA SOCIALIST

THE FALSE MESSIAH HAS ARRIVED !!!
all hail king barry.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• obama
• sucks
• healthcare
• plan
• stimulus
• pork
• bill
• auto
• bailout
• cash
• for
• clunkers
• pelosi
• clinton
• harry
• reid
• barney
• frank
• apocalypse
• soon
• socialism
• is
• here
• failure
• false
• messiah

[liamrenn]

You're a fucking idiot.

[rufflesworld]

@liamrenn gee, thanks for your comment!

I just live to amuse and antagonize the morons that watch!

ps...somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing THEIR idiot!

you should be ashamed, if you voted for barry. I hope you are enjoying YOUR "hope and change"...what a fucking sad joke your obama is.

[mustachecrossing]

Wow, I came here looking for a coherent argument for why people think Obama is a socialist, and I've been watching videos for 2 hours and they're all just like this one.

I'm starting to think there is no reasonable argument, and people believe it just because they hear Glenn Beck say it a lot. "A lie told often enough becomes truth" - Vladimir Lenin. Beck is more of a communist than Obama.

[Corpopetrussien]

Well, he should be, but we can't obtain everything ! :) The world probably will be better if Obama were socialist (and if Sarah Pailin were living on Jupiter), but what he did is already a very good job... So, don't be afraid, Amercia isn't ready yet for socialism (which isn't communism, will stop to confound both ?).

[Corpopetrussien]

Well, I'm a french socialist (I'll vote in may, because we've got our own presidential election this year, for our french socialist candidate : François HOLLANDE) and I can tell you that someone who didn't abolish death penalty, who didn't make a public and an absolutely free health and education system isn't socialist ! Obama isn't socialist : he's what we call a "social-liberal". That's better than conservative or liberal (dirty beast), but it's not socialist...

[Mrihearvoices]

@infancysguard giving up that fast? that's too bad. i really enjoyed my reasonable discussion with you

[infancysguard]

@Mrihearvoices

Buddy, interacting with you has become much too tiresome. I have better things to do with my time than to go around in circles with you.

[Mrihearvoices]

@infancysguard so basically you're saying this: I know everything and you don't no anything. Therefore, I will have a closed mind and disregard everything you say.

[infancysguard]

@Mrihearvoices

No, the generalization you made was that a lot of people with money don't deserve it.

[infancysguard]

@Mrihearvoices

Look, you're still missing my main point, but I'm not going to repeat it.

You make assumptions. Why would I be against charities? But it is the individual's decision whether or not to donate money to causes they support or don't. Feel free to go back and read a response I wrote to somebody called xboy or something like that. I think it's on the 4th or 5th page of these comments.

[infancysguard]

@Mrihearvoices

This whole exchange can be summed up very clearly: You think government should be up people's asses and have the power to take away the fruits of their labor. I don't. You don't know what a generalization is. I do. Goodbye.

[Mrihearvoices]

@infancysguard they're economically capitalist.

[Mrihearvoices]

@infancysguard True, I did make a generalization at the end. There's plenty of rich people that are OK with being taxed just a little more, so that dirt poor families can eat meals. In my personal opinion, I think it's pretty selfish for the rich to care about a small percentage of their money while somewhere else families are working hard and starving/suffering. I guess then to you, the whole idea of charities is wrong. And by the way, while China IS communist which is very liberal,