Obama Birth Certificate -- EXPERT Eval Part 4 - Mystery of the Strange Layers - Conclusion
Uploader Comments (springfieldcompguy)
Video Responses
All Comments (155)
-
@clarity023 Hi, clarity!
Not sure who your comments were addressed to. There's a Reply button to the right of comments.
For more info, I will be debating several of those put forth as experts on the birther side this Saturday on Mark Gillar Tea Party Power Hour. Saturday 2 pm US Central Time. I think you can tune in at blogtalkradio. Do a search for Tea Party Power Hour.
Lots more info as well in an entire book I wrote, and also at obamabirthbook dott comm.
-
/e9D4n6_Uifk Watch the interview with Dr Fukino she said "no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii" and this was on national news! Who do you think that Congress is going to believe? Her or a bunch of conspiracyst idiots in YT?
-
Both birth certificates are genuine, TWO Republicans ( High Officials in HI) Lingle and Dr Fukino certified that he was born at the Kapiolani in HI. So shut up birther, you are the one making a fake one to discredit the president. He won! Get over it because he is going to be re-elected!
-
Incidentally, it's really pretty fascinating. All you have to do is tell the truth, if you want all kinds of people to step forward, call you names, accuse you of spreading disinformation, and so forth.
THAT'S the REWARD now, apparently, for being the ONE person who actually stands up and tells the TRUTH about an issue.
It's really pretty discouraging and disillusioning.
Also, the AP version is a little different than the Whitehouse website version. The box with the crossed off area is crossed off more in the Whitehouse version. Even if they were the same, it doesn't mean that the AP wasn't given a forged document.
goodfelanj 2 weeks ago
@goodfelanj
On the contrary, blurring and pixelation from optimization -- which are fairly significant -- aside, they look the same. All of the same elements are in all of the same places.
See obamabirthbook d o t c o m/img/box.gif
springfieldcompguy 2 weeks ago
@goodfelanj By the way, these videos only made up the very beginning of a very long and thorough investigation that I did. The full investigation was detailed in a 221-page book, "Is Barack Obama's Birth Certificate a Fraud? A Computer Guy Examines the Evidence for Forgery."
That book is available at Amazon and BarnesandNoble d o t com.
I'm sorry the results of the investigation don't come out in such a way as to please everybody. Unfortunately, it isn't possible to do so.
springfieldcompguy 2 weeks ago
I am sorry, but you take far too much pleasure and satisfaction in proving that it is not a fake, and also in using wording that makes it obvious you were never objective. If the part of Stanley Ann's signature that touches other objects makes it treated differently than the parts that doesn't touch other objects, wouldn't the letters that are covered by the parenthesis become part of her signature and on that layer, and not on the layer with the rest of the word?
goodfelanj 2 weeks ago
@goodfelanj
I take pleasure and satisfaction in doing a professional job, and in providing good, solid information that -- at the time of these videos -- went entirely against the "conventional wisdom" -- and yet was 100% correct when the conventional wisdom was 100% wrong.
9 months later, none of the information presented in these videos -- or in my book published 5 months ago -- has been factually refuted.
springfieldcompguy 2 weeks ago
@goodfelanj
And yes, if my claim is correct, the "n" and the "t" covered by that parenthesis should become part of the same (antialiased) layer. So would the other contiguous letters -- the "igna" and the "of."
And that is EXACTLY what we see. ALL of those letters -- and those letters only out of "Signature of Parent or Other Informant" -- are part of the same layer as the parenthesis.
springfieldcompguy 2 weeks ago