Pele vs Maradona
Uploader Comments (streetstylemagic)
Top Comments
-
Socrates, the best :D
-
HAHA MY MOTHER SAID I'M THE BEST :).. BTW in 10 years Messi will be the one we talk about...
All Comments (356)
-
Maradona the best for ever
-
Was Einstein that good at football?
-
@PunkLobo Like Silvio Santos (host in Brazil). Silvio Santos is the host, the TV man. And Señor Abravanel (his real name) is the businessman.
-
In this video Sócrates was the one who sad something with sense.
-
Respect Socrates
R.I.P
-
King Socrates; something tells me death held no fears for him.
-
R.I.P Dr. Sócrates
-
pelé the king
-
207 goals of Pele in a 22 minute video:
watch?v=88BQYlJ5dUQ
-
RIP Socrates.
Ps.: The reason why Pele talks in third person is because he says Pele is part of his past, and Only Edson Arantes remains. He also says Pele is the player, while Edson is the person.
at club level (Thewardsters research)
Pele took Santos torecord 5 Brazilian Titles in a row while the team struggled in games he missed (20losses in 45 national/intercontinental games from 1959-69). Team improved 0.6 points per game when he was in side.
Maradona lifted his European sides from just 1.23 to 1.32 ppg (1982-93).
With this much difference, you don't even have to watch any footage to know who the most complete player is. PELE!
sptwood05 1 month ago 3
@sptwood05 while it's true that pele was more complete, stats are completely circumstantial and can be very misleading if you interpret them the wrong way. compare man city's last year results with carlos tevez to this year's results without tevez. does that mean tevez is a worse player than dzeko/nasri/aguero? absolutely not.
streetstylemagic 1 month ago
To sum up:
Argentina WITH Maradona in 1977-94
In 91 games: 45.6% win, 31.8% draw, 21.9% lost
WITHOUT Maradona:
In 94 games between 1977-1994: 44.6% win, 34% draw , 21% lost
hmmm does anyone see a great difference??? NOT REALLY!!! Maradonas presense brought the same results overall!!! LOL
sptwood05 1 month ago
@sptwood05 as much as i am pro pele in this discussion, i must point out that stats are very often misleading. people have used stats to say liverpool doesn't need steven gerrard, when obviously that is not the case. and the same here. argentina was obviously better with maradona despite what stats tell you.
streetstylemagic 1 month ago
different postions.you cant compare them really.but marradona on the ball is UNREAL!!!.as for people sayin Zidane....most over rated player of all time.we wouldnt even consider him as a great if it wasnt for that goal he scored against leverkusen.
bigbadchillybear 1 month ago
@bigbadchillybear i agree it's a bit overrating him to consider him on par with pele or maradona..... but zidane was still one of the greats.
streetstylemagic 1 month ago 2