Daniel Hannan talks Constitutional responsibility with Judge Napolitano on Freedom Watch

lol. I'm Brittish. Trust me. This guys a one off. Most Brittish people I know are retarded.

Unfortunately I must second that sentiment, although I am Swedish and it goes the same, even for my own countrymen and women.

Your living document spew ignores the fact that the founders included the right to amend the constitution as opposed to just making up whatever one wants the constitution to mean at any given time.

"...just making up whatever one wants the constitution to mean at any given time."

Aint it always "making up whatever one wants" or 'activist judges' when it doesn't fit what YOU want it say. Funny how that works

Did someone inform you that they have the ONE TRUE proper interpretation?

They lied, & generations of disagreeing judges that are smarter & having vast more knowledge on the Constitution & FF then you will tell you that.

Considering the FF didn't even agree on the exact meaning...

I'll be waiting for you to point out the "right to privacy" in the 4th Amendment. When words can mean whatever the interpreter wants, then words have no meaning at all. That's the purpose of the amendment process.

Couldn't agree more that "it's all bullshit, and it's bad for ya'". RIP, George! Yes, the Constitution is somewhat outdated, but it's intent is still true. Never mind the 200+ years of statute and code that have essentially replaced it.

I understand that if I do business in the public domain, I am subject to UCC. That's how it should be. However, when I'm taking my family for a ride in the mountains, I'm operating in private. There is no code that applies to private activity.