I'm sure glad that Fox put on a scientist to discuss this. With so much public ignorance about the science, just letting some idiot spout off unoppossed would be irresponsible science reporting. And those libtards who say that Fox isn't just biased, but is straight-up propaganda, would really whine if Fox put on, unoppossed, some gop partisan hack, the kind who might've worked with Inhofe, or one skeezy enough to have initiated the Swift Boat campaign. Fortunately, Fox does journalism proud!
Re: "Hansen... who's every prediction has been shown to be wrong"
Bullshit.
Let me repeat myself: 17 years in advance, Hansen predicted .33C warming. The measured warming was .32 C.
Have noticed a pattern here? You're extremely confident, yet ignorant as hell, and basically wrong about everything you hold - point by point - yet you imagine you know more about this than the planet's scientists. This combination is the norm for deniers I've encountered, and it never ceases to amaze me.
Re: "Gore has made a killing, Mann actually has a career; something it's hard to imagine him otherwise having and Hansen is an eco lunatic"
That's your reply to my posting that "Free market orgs & ideologues... decide to smear Gore, Mann, Hansen, etc., and the sheep soon come to *know* that those people are incompetent, dishonest, and most importantly, dismissible." Just how stupid are you?
Re: "Or the evidence that hurricane activity will increase due to warming?"
Do you understand the difference between severity and frequency? That seems to be far too subtle a distinction for the typical denier moron - hence this confusion. A few claims about frequency were made - very tentative, and explicitly w/o high confidence. But hey, you're only 95% wrong here, so it's your best showing! Well done!
Re: "Or the evidence that poor diet causes stomach ulcers?"
Re: "Like the evidence that Human's are causing the hole in the Ozone layer"
Yes - like that. Let me guess - you don't know shit about this issue either, right?
Re: "Or the evidence that sea level will rise 20m by the year 2000?"
I'll be admit that you aren't full of shit, IF you can give a journal citation where any climatologist published any such prediction. But otherwise, you're full of shit.
Re: "I'd better tweak the parameters so they match". Is that a conspiracy?"
No. And there's also no evidence that any such thing happens. You mistake your fantasies for reality, despite it already being demonstrated that you have no clue about what the GCMs are doing or how they're written.
@VeryEvilPettingZoo "Perhaps you should go to the next meeting of the Royal Society or National Academy of Sciences and inform them that their scientific conclusions are "disingenuous crap"
Like the evidence that Human's are causing the hole in the Ozone layer? Or the evidence that sea level will rise 20m by the year 2000? Or the evidence that hurricane activity will increase due to warming? Or the evidence that poor diet causes stomach ulcers? It's all bollocks.
I'm sure glad that Fox put on a scientist to discuss this. With so much public ignorance about the science, just letting some idiot spout off unoppossed would be irresponsible science reporting. And those libtards who say that Fox isn't just biased, but is straight-up propaganda, would really whine if Fox put on, unoppossed, some gop partisan hack, the kind who might've worked with Inhofe, or one skeezy enough to have initiated the Swift Boat campaign. Fortunately, Fox does journalism proud!
VeryEvilPettingZoo 6 months ago
(cont)
Re: "Hansen... who's every prediction has been shown to be wrong"
Bullshit.
Let me repeat myself: 17 years in advance, Hansen predicted .33C warming. The measured warming was .32 C.
Have noticed a pattern here? You're extremely confident, yet ignorant as hell, and basically wrong about everything you hold - point by point - yet you imagine you know more about this than the planet's scientists. This combination is the norm for deniers I've encountered, and it never ceases to amaze me.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@Robinsonion
Re: "Gore has made a killing, Mann actually has a career; something it's hard to imagine him otherwise having and Hansen is an eco lunatic"
That's your reply to my posting that "Free market orgs & ideologues... decide to smear Gore, Mann, Hansen, etc., and the sheep soon come to *know* that those people are incompetent, dishonest, and most importantly, dismissible." Just how stupid are you?
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
(cont)
Re: "Or the evidence that hurricane activity will increase due to warming?"
Do you understand the difference between severity and frequency? That seems to be far too subtle a distinction for the typical denier moron - hence this confusion. A few claims about frequency were made - very tentative, and explicitly w/o high confidence. But hey, you're only 95% wrong here, so it's your best showing! Well done!
Re: "Or the evidence that poor diet causes stomach ulcers?"
WTF?
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@Robinsonion
Re: "Like the evidence that Human's are causing the hole in the Ozone layer"
Yes - like that. Let me guess - you don't know shit about this issue either, right?
Re: "Or the evidence that sea level will rise 20m by the year 2000?"
I'll be admit that you aren't full of shit, IF you can give a journal citation where any climatologist published any such prediction. But otherwise, you're full of shit.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@Robinsonion
Re: "I have a feeling they know it already"
Back to the conspiracy theories. The planet's scientists are just a bunch of deceivers, eh?
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@Robinsonion
Re: "I'd better tweak the parameters so they match". Is that a conspiracy?"
No. And there's also no evidence that any such thing happens. You mistake your fantasies for reality, despite it already being demonstrated that you have no clue about what the GCMs are doing or how they're written.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
@VeryEvilPettingZoo "A conspiracy of all the dozens of groups involved, in a common fraud,"
"oh my model temperatures don't match expectation, I'd better tweak the parameters so they match". Is that a conspiracy?
Robinsonion 1 year ago
@VeryEvilPettingZoo "Perhaps you should go to the next meeting of the Royal Society or National Academy of Sciences and inform them that their scientific conclusions are "disingenuous crap"
I have a feeling they know it already.
Robinsonion 1 year ago
@VeryEvilPettingZoo "and EVIDENCE presented by the planet's scientists"
Like the evidence that Human's are causing the hole in the Ozone layer? Or the evidence that sea level will rise 20m by the year 2000? Or the evidence that hurricane activity will increase due to warming? Or the evidence that poor diet causes stomach ulcers? It's all bollocks.
Robinsonion 1 year ago