Top Comments
All Comments (290)
-
@442hoeky Agreed. Its an impressive technical achievement and the storyline is good overall, but the beauty and the beast theme was taken a step too far.
-
@CHADE47lol Probably. But I don't think the silver back of a troop hides even from leopards. A 500 pound gorilla can put on a heck of a show when threatened and I doubt most leopards would risk a fight.
-
@442hoeky I think he meant when African Gorillas see African Leopards.
-
I liked the 2005 version a lot. The one mistake Peter Jackson made in my opinion is he tried too hard to make us like and feel for Kong. In the original, he was a monster and the girl was afraid of him from start to finish (never quite sure what his intentions were). The audience felt bad for Kong anyway, even though there was no real attempt to endear him to us. PJ took the modern approach of treating the audience like mindless idiots and trying to force us to like Kong.
-
@lvgcoolman13 You mean when African gorillas see Asian tigers? Yeah, that happens all the time. You really know your stuff.
-
lets face it. king kong can take on a t rex an win. all we do is get our asses kicked by raptors.....an bugs.
-
@staff50ord 1976 sucked but the 2005 version was good.
-
Vastatosaurus is amazing! 70 feet long!
-
@staff50ord Actually, I liked the 2005 version. it's not as great as the original, but it's still a good remake compared to other remakes. And I do agree with you with the other one.



Wow, Peter Jacksons version is really similar to this one!
And gosh, you stupid trolls. Why do you want Kong to look friggin ugly and ferocious?
He looks ferocious in Peter Jacksons Version as well.
And you're all saying that King Kong (2005) was focused on CGI detail.
The storyline and was very deep and made everyone feel bad for King Kong.
____________
Look at AVATAR! That movie was about CGI, but the storyline was friggin simple.
And yet Avatar was worshipped!
MicroHelper 6 months ago 18
12 people had thier jaws broken by king kong
Lance1nf 6 months ago 9