YouTube Now Banning Videos Critical of Global Warming Alarmism

Alex Jones gets an update from Marc Morano concerning their recent (4-2-12) Nightly News Interview that was banned by You Tube over some nebulous community guidelines violation. In this country you are not allowed to have a discussion about University Professors who call for your "treatment" if you don't worship on the alter of the now disproved theory of anthropogenic global warming and or climate change. Once they take our free speech tyranny is just around the corner.

You Tube Now Banning Videos Critical of Global Warming Alarmism
http://www.infowars.com/you-tube-cens...

Poking fun at public figure who advocates tyranny violates "community guidelines"

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Poking fun at a public figure who openly calls for skeptics of man-made global warming to be "treated" as a way of re-educating them is apparently off limits for You Tube, who censored a video in which Alex Jones used absurdist satire as a vehicle to illustrate the crackpot and dangerous beliefs of University of Oregon Professor Kari Norgaard.
As we documented last week, during a climate change conference in London which promoted the idea of forcibly imprisoning humans in ghetto prison cities for the good of the earth, Norgaard presented a paper in which she characterized doubts about anthropogenic climate change as both racist and a "sickness" for which individuals need to be "treated".

The video, which can be viewed above via Blip.tv, contains a clip from Infowars Nightly News in which Alex Jones gives Professor Norgaard the coveted 'Skeksy Award', which is reserved for only the most ardent promoters of tyranny and authoritarianism.
After Rush Limbaugh also directed scorn at Norgaard's work, the University of Oregon had to back down and claim the inclusion of the word "treated" in the press release describing Norgaard's paper was a mistake. Norgaard is now being framed at the victim of the whole piece, despite the fact that her dangerously authoritarian tendencies are shared by a raft of other prominent global warming alarmists.
Indeed, videos made by global warming alarmist groups showing children being blown up and having their guts splatted everywhere for not reducing their carbon footprint are apparently fine by You Tube, but suggesting Norgaard isn't the most attractive woman on the planet is tantamount to hate speech.
The humor directed at Norgaard is at worst sophomoric -- it can hardly be described as being "designed to harass, bully or threaten," which are the labels You Tube applied in deleting the clip and placing a strike against the Alex Jones Channel.
This is straight out of the playbook of Obama's information czar Cass Sunstein, who in a 2008 paper advocated taxing or outright banning political ideas not approved of by the establishment -- including skepticism of man-made global warming.
The 'Community Guidelines warning strike' (see it here), cautions that the account is "not in good standing" because a You Tube user flagged the Norgaard video as having violated You Tube's community guidelines which pertain to preventing, "predatory behavior, stalking, threats, harassment, intimidation, invading privacy, revealing other people's personal information, and inciting others to commit violent acts."
When an account is considered by You Tube to be "not in good standing," privileges are removed and repeated violations can result in termination of the account altogether, and with it the loss of tens of millions of video views and hundreds of thousands of subscribers.

• Category

  News & Politics

[Trixter210916813]

its hard to be heard and spread the word when the sites we use are censored and ruled by the ones we are fighting against. MARIA

[catwhowilleatplanet1]

we should all have the right to speak and be heard just like we all have the right to not like something and simply dismiss it from our thoughts. freedom of speech is one of the key ingredients to bring about more peace. we are humans, not robots. we don't need anyone telling us what to listen to and what to believe. that's why we have our own brains: to make our own decisions.

[redddbaron]

LOL Yes I do know how science works. And yes it does work by consensus...eventually. Might be painful to watch as they argue it out, especially when you see a push for a model your instincts say is wrong. But in the end it eventually will work itself out.

As far as global warming....it exists. The % contributed by mankind may be small, but it exists. You are only living with your head in the sand if you think it doesn't exist at all. Mankind does have an effect on the climate. That is certain.

[Indrasblade39]

Ummm no. All the scientific evidence is against man made global warming. The Alarmists have ZERO evidence.

i wouldn't call hundreds of top scientists against AGW as consensus, by the way, if you had any knowledge whatsoever of science you know that science is not done by consensus, especially of scientists that push models that are proven to be wrong.

Watch this and learn: /watch?v=plr-hTRQ2_c

[redddbaron]

First of all man made global warming is happening. You may not like it, but there is a scientific consensus finally after years of very heated debate. But there is a way to reverse the part contributed by human activity very quickly and easily and without costing a dime. In fact it will generate income. There is hope. A major breakthrough has been made.

watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI

[ryan8878]

Having a minor in Geology and after taking many class in geographical studies, I beg you, take a few classes. The world does go through cycles but the evidence is clear that with the rate of change that is occuring. Our world's ability to adapt is under severe strain.

[MrWhatwhathuh]

co2 doesn't cause global warming, the planet warms and cools and the main driver is the sun. when the arctic ice rebounds and global temps drop you will see the lie.

[purehatredandevil]

I never said it was a "conspiracy", and we all get why it freezes at 301. not even sure what you were getting at, or what your reply was even about?