yeah thats what 3000 clock solves in two weeks will do for you. i havent practiced since school started though. i need to relube my clock and then i'll start again once mid-terms are over(this week). with some more practice i think i have a good shot at breaking the NAR or even the WR. I've beaten the WR single a lot, and i've beaten the mean like 3 times. i still have a TON of practicin to do though.
i always use clock notation. these scrambles were from the speedsolving forums, but for practice i will use my calculator to generate random numbers and just plug them into the clock scramble sequence.
and thanks, i was really happy about that first one, its still my nonlucky pb. i need to start practicing again, ill try to get a sub-10 avg of 12 on tape.
you are crazy. speed up the scrambling?
fanwuq 3 years ago
yes i did(watch 0:09-0:12)
vault312 3 years ago
It actually looks believable to be not speeded up. I bet you can move that fast without speeding up!
fanwuq 3 years ago
yeah thats what 3000 clock solves in two weeks will do for you. i havent practiced since school started though. i need to relube my clock and then i'll start again once mid-terms are over(this week). with some more practice i think i have a good shot at breaking the NAR or even the WR. I've beaten the WR single a lot, and i've beaten the mean like 3 times. i still have a TON of practicin to do though.
vault312 3 years ago
did you use clock notation or hand scramble?
esquimalt1 3 years ago
i always use clock notation. these scrambles were from the speedsolving forums, but for practice i will use my calculator to generate random numbers and just plug them into the clock scramble sequence.
and thanks, i was really happy about that first one, its still my nonlucky pb. i need to start practicing again, ill try to get a sub-10 avg of 12 on tape.
vault312 3 years ago