Capitalist Equilibrium? 1 of 2
Uploader Comments (brendanmcooney)
All Comments (69)
-
Nobody said anything about an eternal zero-sum game.
-
The only problem here is that capitalism isn't a zero-sum game
-
There is a difference between "money" and "currency".
-
Money is a commodity. In a free banking regime, currency, or "notes" would represent a specific amount of a specific commodity, such as gold, silver, or wheat. Notes are redeemable on demand. Currency would not be based on the "full faith and credit of the US government" but on the ability of a private bank to honor its notes. The moment a bank can not honor its notes, is it placed into receivership, and its assets are auctioned off with the proceeds going to depositors first.
-
As workers do not receive equal energy (monetary) value for labor and/or the owners of the means of production sell products/services above the embodied energy value, the sum nominal value of all goods and services always exceeds the sum energy income of the worker/consumer. Every product sold for profit extracts energy (money) from the labor class. The profit system was never and can never be in energy equilibrium. Its over, growth and thus profit is tapped out. Entropy always wins.
-
What a legend.
How do external costs of the capitalist (such as corporate tax, local council rates, rent on factory land) fit into the C-V-S formula? as often the capitalist would rais the price of a good to make up for these external costs.
Catholicboy4life 2 years ago
Taxes and rent are a deduction from S (profits). The ability of a capitalist to raise prices above values depends on the amount of competition in the industry. Raising prices above values does not raise the total net profit of society. It only redistributes profits from some capitalists to others.
brendanmcooney 2 years ago 2
Was that Amy Goodman at 30 seconds?
jumpnjza2 2 years ago
Yes. That's her getting arrested at the RNC.
brendanmcooney 2 years ago