Ciaconna BuxWV160
Uploader Comments (ririkuku)
Top Comments
-
No, I don't mean foxtrot. I just mean that you did play much faster at the end than at the first.
In addition, you can't suggest foxtrot because it is 2/2 or 4/4 , not 3/4 time.
I think the modulation of music is very important,
but you needn't change the speed so much for Ciaconna.
You know, Ciaconna is just mild dance.
All Comments (27)
-
@mjmorgue Seriously who is Cabezon,a famous scholar you know? Surely I don't think that Ciaconna is simply the dance music but i just hope to be dance music. I understood that its not a foxtrot as her interpretation making her music better. I think a scholar saying is often making bad sense in front of all music players.
-
@alphakonf Everyone knows a ciacona is a dance, however many composers used titles that didn't actually mean the work was intended for dancing...but rather the the format was borrowed. Her interpretation is quick and uneven, but there is no law stating that a work must be danced. Cabezon wrote several Pavanas which are obviously not intended as dance music, but rather merely titles .....lighten up...and study your history.
-
correct, accurate, precise but somehow... spiritless
-
sublime thank you
-
THANK YOU SOOO MUCH; SAYA!!!!
-
Bravo !
With Soul..
-
"ririkuku, ...lo toca todo" bravo
-
I love this play! Great job! Thanks !!
-
Good Job!
-
Great performance!
you had better keep the first speed on Ciaconna because it is to be dance music.
alphakonf 4 years ago
of course ciaconna is a dance, but it's not a foxtrot, you don't need to dance fast.
ririkuku 4 years ago
Shoes on pedals = One star
carol9821 4 years ago
hahahaha, what do you want? Swimfin, moonboots? it's about music not fashion or fetishism!
ririkuku 4 years ago 3