An Interesting Footnote

I demonstrate why theistic evolution is garbage.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• theistic
• evolution
• atheism
• christianity
• creationism
• intelligent
• design
• biodiversity
• darwin

[tomspencer155]

ok, as someone who also thinks theistic evolution is rubbish i can happily say you make bad points, in a bad way in a bad video. There arer so much more valid points than the ones you raise.

[friendofdarwin]

Thank you for the constructive criticism tomspencer155, I would love if you could message me these points. I am always eager to learn and improve.

[danieltrujillo]

hey can i reupload this vid? and give you all the glory of course.

[friendofdarwin]

of course! be my guest.

[Eaglewing17]

@sanjuanpapi as a creationist, i'm going to tell u that in evolution's "simplest form", there's just a single-cell(which appartenly evolved out of nowhere?). cells are a-sexual. but yes, later on, it would pose problems as to how a male and female organism would be around at the same time with fully-developed reproductive organs. i've never heard anyone disprove that.

[JennyFarlopez]

Congratulations, you've destroyed 150 years of work of thousands of the brightest minds of the planet with a single phrase full of gramatical errors. You can go to Sweden and pick up your Nobel prize whenever you want.

[sanjuanpapi]

if u break the evolution theory to it s simplest form ,one question pops up,the male couldn't have existed without a FEMALE of the same age to reproduce the next beings,therefore evolution is debunked,SATANS LIE WILL NEVER AFFECT ME,OR RELIGION LIES.

[MikeyFlorida]

Theistic evolution is not a competing "theory", nor does it try to be. It is far different from 6-day creationism. Theistic evolution is a full acknowledgment and agreement with the scientific consensus of the development of life (evolution theory) and theistic evolutionists realize the compatibility of a respect for science and a belief in God.

if you understand science/evolution theory as well as theistic evolution you would know this.

[MikeyFlorida]

"another noteworthy point is that Ockam himself was a theist, and to adhere to his principle (as misstated in this video) as in contention with theism clearly involves misunderstanding of "Occam's razor"."

and again, you are using a misrepresentation of Occam's razor.

[MikeyFlorida]

did you read my previous comment?...

"another few points are that most theistic evolutionists' belief in science is one not dependent on God, but rather independent and compatible. therefore occam's razor (in it's misstated form as represented in this video) does NOT pose a problem to theistic evolution."

[JennyFarlopez]

*likely to be true.

Evolution is far superior as a thery because it relies on fewer AXIOMS to explain the same facts.

[JennyFarlopez]

However, one must assume less axioms to explain evolution than to expain creationism.

Evolution is explainable through very few and simple physical laws plus mathematical developement (which isn't axiomatic).

An unexplainable and lawless creation of a god needs an axiom for each and every observation. Therefore is far less to be likely.