Creationist Lies (Human Evolution and the Stupidity of Creationists 1)

This video examines the common creationist lie that Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo heidelbergensis and the Neanderthals represent mere racial variations of modern humans. Wheteher presented by Lubenow Yahya of any other dishonest creationist fool, this lie remains essentially the same and highlights their deep incompetence.
The video also misrepresents a a quote from Richard Leakey, a typical example of the creationist quote mine in action. Afer dealing with this we examine encephalisation and the DNA of neanderthals to finally seal the case.

References,

Seven Million Years‎ by Douglas Palmer (Source of encephalisation graph)

The making of mankind by Richard E. Leakey (Source of Leakey quote p115-116)

A Complete Neandertal Mitochondrial Genome Sequence Determined by High-Throughput Sequencing Cell, Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages 416-426 R. Green, Et al

The wisdom of the bones by Alan Walker, Pat Shipman

From Lucy to language‎ by Donald C. Johanson, Blake Edgar

Further reading,

The Fossil Trail: How We Know what We Think We Know about Human Evolution‎ by Ian Tattersall

In Search of the Neanderthals: Solving the Puzzle of Human Origins‎ by Chris Stringer, Clive Gamble

The Complete World Of Human Evolution‎ by Chris Stringer, Peter Andrews

The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution‎ by Steve Jones, Robert D. Martin, David R. Pilbeam


Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA Richard E. Green et al

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• creationism
• creationist
• lie
• dishonest
• human
• evolution
• Homo
• erectus
• heidelbergensis
• ergaster
• missing
• link
• ape
• man
• hominid
• hominin

[KennyTew2]

@JungleJargon "There is no evidence that we came from knuckle walkers."

There is reasonably compelling evidence that you don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about, as evidenced by comment.

[KennyTew2]

@earlysda "more and more people who choose to believe the evidence."

There isnt a single peer reviewed article that supports creationism, and tens of thousands with evidence for evolution. With new hominin species being discovered all the time and well over 20 established species to date. So lets teach both sides, it only takes ten seconds to inform students that there isnt a single shred of evidence for creationism, then challenge them to search the literature and see if they can find any!

[KennyTew2]

If the full glory of the English language is offensive to you then I suggest you grow up and stop being so prissy. If you don't understand what circular reasoning is then you must be dumb, if you then still arrogantly insist that you know better than every expert, which is a genuinely offensive notion (your complete ignorance is not as valid as their hard won knowledge) then you are a dumb fuck. Stop being arrogant and you can get promoted to just dumb.

[KennyTew2]

@earlysda You are incapable of understanding even the basics of logic but are so arrogant that you believe you know more that the experts without ever studying even entry level anatomy? You are calling almost every scientist in the world either dishonest or incompetent without even a single shred of supporting evidence, (which I have asked you for) yet this is OK, while taking offence when someone points out that your failure to understand even simple logic proves you are dumb.

[earlysda]

@KennyTew2 Typical foul mouth language of those who have no evidence for their position.

[KennyTew2]

@earlysda Yeah thats right, the principles of logic are a mere assertion. You are either joking or a serious dumb fuck.

[earlysda]

@KennyTew2 This is your assertion. There is no evidence for your assertion.

The fact that you can make any assertions at all is evidence for a Creator who enabled you to make assertions :)

[KennyTew2]

@earlysda Ok I'll explain. The existance of humans requires an explanation. There are many competing explanations. Using that which one sets out to explain as evidence for any of the competing hypothesis is circular reasoning, a serious logical error.Furthermore it applies equally to each and every possible explanation.

You are essentually saying A needs explaining, B is a possible explanation for A therefore if A then B. If you dont see how dumb this is you have my pity.

[earlysda]

@KennyTew2 The existence of humans is 100% proof for the existence of the Creator God. That is perfect logic.

[elnoraemily]

@earlysda The evidence before him proves evolution. Just because you cannot understand, does not make it invalid.

[Proteched]

@KennyTew2 Use your eyes.