Michael Kamber on the Leica M9

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
39,912
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 12, 2010

Michael Kamber, contract photographer for the New York Times talks about his experience as a photojournalist and why he uses the Leica M9.

To read an exclusive interview that accompanies this video, please visit the Leica Camera Blog: http://blog.leica-camera.com/interview/an-interview-with-michael-kamber-of-th...

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • how it kept working if is not weather sealed?

  • come on guys, its obvious there are a brunch of idiots being jealous of the leica users. Just ignore them, every person has their own value.

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • can't do the water trick with the M9 :D

  • oh man, this video is so full of it, pure marketing.

  • @marcomarcucci because it isn't weather sealed, that doesnt mean it's made of sugar.

  • @marcomarcucci

    German Engineering

  • it was just the ending of his "story tale..." no go for a M9.... cheers ! ! !

  • Interesting that there's no mention of how he reviewed the M8 while in Iraq and basically called it a total POS.

    Guess the M9 is superior and/or he was paid well for this video.

  • @marcomarcucci I think we'd all be surprised about how well non weather sealed cameras can stand up to the wet. Look at digitalrev's "durability test" (they pour hot water on two non weather sealed dslrs and they were fine). I'm not saying weather sealing is total bs, but it's not as important as people and all the marketing hype make it out to be. And there are plenty of stories about M8s and M9s being used in the rain, google is your friend

  • it really looks wonderful !! fuck nikons and canons !!

  • i would love one of these , stevehuffphoto and iloverangefinders have competitions to win one , not that ill ever win one or buy one , $7000 dollars is nuts though , if i dont eat or pay rent for a year i could buy one with no lenses

    but there is something about the look of a rangefinder image , it looks different to an slr pic ? and lets face it , even the people who come on here to leave shitty comments , secretly want one

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more