911 Molten Steel
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (13)
-
@batmangreen Dr. Astaneh Asl said "I saw melting of girders at World Trade Center." Girders would be steel. You can see a picture of one of them in my video:
The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
-
Do you have proof that any of these molten steel pools are actually steel and not another substance like aluminum? I don;t think you do.
And lol at using Abdolhassan Astaneh Asl as a reference. Astaneh-Asl was referencing the softening of the girders, and he is an adamant promoter of the debunkers.
-
What I meant is that a scale model wouldn't yeild accurate results no matter what material you used, unless you constructed it to 1:1 scale.
Also, nobody claims that the jet fuel melted the steel; This is a straw-man argument.
-
SO you are saying an aluminum model to scale size wouldn't work cause it doesn't have the same weight as steel? But steel is heavier and stronger, an melts at a much higher temperature, so I would think aluminum you would have a greater chance of actually getting the aluminum to melt from jet fuel, since steel can't melt from jet fuel.
So even if it doesn't have the same weight, you at least are more likely to get it to melt, thus being able to recreate the towers falling easier.
-
It's true. the ones that believe in "19 crazy arabs hijacking 4 planes and crashing them in the most heavily monitored region of the world led by a man with a long beard" is also a conspiracy theory. Because there is absolutely no proof that this actually happened. except for the planes crashing and the many lives unfortunately taken. and 5 frames form the pentagon site and 1 paper passport that flew out of the plane after it crashed into the towers and burning.
-
Aluminium isn't strong enough to support the structure.
A scale model wouldn't yeild accurate results because the cause of the collapse was the immense weight of the building pressing down on the bowing support columns which was caused by the sagging floor trusses.
-
Maybe when they originally constructed the WTC, they skimped on the steel and used aluminum instead in order to save money?
I'm just trying to help the government come up with a better story.
One thought though. Even if you used a scale model, made of aluminum instead of steel, and tried to show how the building feel like it did from fire, i doubt someone could recreate the way the WTC fell.
-
Maybe a person that really cares about the truth
-
660C Melting point of aluminium.
Why quote so many referenced reports of molten steel from reliable witnesses? Perhaps because NIST and the BBC and other faith-based regurgitators of the official conspiracy theory repeatedly deny the existence of molten steel. Defence of the official dogma requires denial of such documented facts.
Bernadotte01 3 years ago 4
@batmangreen
"Left: Thermal Imagery of the progression of molten steel hotspots from September 18 to September 25 "
GeoNews, October, 2001
You can't "debunk" facts.
Bernadotte01 1 year ago