Technology in Cricket - Video Referral for Catches
Top Comments
All Comments (25)
-
Cameras always show it doesn't carry. I'm 100% sure thats out although, if it was refered it would have been given not out
-
he wouldn't have lasted much longer anyway.
-
ricky ponting believes if the catch has been claimed the batsmen should leave, why did he not tell his young partner to leave immediately? Or wait does it only work that why when australia is on the field? LOL
-
fuck strauss listen to the commentators oh its ok its just an illusion a trick that the camera is playing what a load of bullshit if that was the other way round the english commentators would have been like oh what a bad decision by the umpire fucking biased cunts
-
Disgraceful from Strauss and from the umpires! Clearly NOT OUT!
-
England didn't deserve the 2009 Ashes.
-
@gloves71 so by your logic strauss is a cheat?
-
probably a no ball too
-
@streeetfighter heh good one...
the thing is you dont hear aussies whinging about somthign like this years later AKA indians.
-
What on earth are you all talking about??? Strauss has NEVER claimed a catch that wasn't out - here included - unlike that tosser Punter, there are at least 4 recorded incidents of him claiming catches that weren't out (and were given not out)
@AerospaceEngineer90: that is also a crock of shit - you ALWAYS know if you've caught it or not. That is something that Australian players say to justify their attempts at cheating
Strauss is a fucking cheat. Disgraceful.
davenavarroforpm 2 years ago 13
Strauss is a f**king asshole he is a f**king retard hughes would have went to make a 50!!!! Bastard!!
iloveabcandbill 2 years ago 11