Evolution vs Creation Debunked #1

This is my reply to the first part of a video series called Evolution vs Creation (that doesn't allow video reponses)

Original video:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=2cpNjyVvqK0

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution
• vs
• creation
• darwin
• bible
• god
• atheist
• debunked
• peppered
• moth
• science
• inteligent
• design

[ChristJesussavedall]

5:16 what is the evidence.

And he didn't just point out problems with hi theory he actually discredited it thee it out the window.

[freemind62]

@ChristJesussavedall I was not referring to a piece of evidence in particular. I was talking about how when evidence doesn't fit the scientific explanation it is changed to reflect that evidence. Creation doesn't do that as their beliefs cannot be changed even when they are shown to be false.

An example of this is the continued assertion that there are no transitional fossils. Look up the evolution of Whales. This was a creationist favourite in the past, but it's fairly complete now.

[stinkyflesh]

Hold up, lets say for a second evolution is completly correct, if it is true the purpose of humanity would be to be born, live, and die... Thats it...now lets ask the question what if your wrong? Well according to biblical belief the evolutionist, if he hasnt been born again, will probably go to hell by what we know from the bible... Now if a christian is wrong... What has he wasted? Absolutly nothing...he will end up in the ground like his evolutionistic brother...

[freemind62]

@stinkyflesh Pascal's Wager? Honestly? You're using Pascal's Wager?

That was discredited about 20 seconds after it was written. Just read the Wikipedia page and it'll give you the information you need.

[Strikesnake1994]

wow, i wish i had the expertise, programs and shear patience to produce things such as this.

[freemind62]

@Strikesnake1994 While I don't know about your expertise or patience. I just use plain old MS movie maker. Not ideal for compex videos, but more than enough to do ones like this. I suggest you give it a try one day. I REALLY need to make more videos, just out of the habit really, but it's not too hard. I mean I do it :)

[MrKGatl]

Want to find a bunch of evolutionists hanging out go to a university

Want to find a bunch of creationists hanging out go to a trailer park

[saur2244]

@stinkyflesh but if we went with your bit no mater what we do theres no meaning to human kind i dont think so.what do think of that

[saur2244]

@stinkyflesh hold on besides useing Pascal's Wager your trying to say becouse we evolved that we as humans have no value?your so wrong.we as people have done many great things the only thing i hate us humans doing is when we harm a dog or house cat that depends on us for safety or that wer littering and dumping garbage.if we try to live a good life try not to kill clean our naberhood and try to respect our earth thats just some of the things that put meaning to our life ...

[Johnf85]

1. Its not the scientific minority, its the majority. 2. Kent hovind is not a real scientist and demonstrates ignorance of common ancestry by saying proof of evolution is a dog turning into a cat 3. quoting scripture to prove your point is called "begging the question", its a fallacy 4. Hovinds $250,000 is worded so that its impossible to provide what hes asking 5.calling evolution a model doesnt discredit it....This is exhausting. This is why I run from creationism. They are dishonest.

[mojo1517]

Here is the deal- We'll agree to teach ID in public schools and Sunday schools, Bible studies, and religious schools teach Darwin's theories of evolution.

Sounds fair to me ...Hitchens rules.

[stevehayes13]

Why is that the the Christian creationists cannot see that quote mining is wrong? Have they never heard of the Ninth Commandment?

[mimarp478]

i love how they separate man birds and reptiles lol creationist never cease to amaze me with their stupidity please keep up the good work freemind62

[winterstellar]

@ChristJesussavedall Every human is "transitional", you are "transitional", I am "transitional". I think you should try to learn what evolution is. Look up *evolution* in wikipedia! : )

[OmfgItsHenu]

@ChristJesussavedall "There are no human transitional fossils."

you mean, the transitional fossils from the common ancestor to modern humans?

there are 16 sub-species between them.

i suggest you do some research first

[ChristJesussavedall]

@freemind62 the example you give is not an example of evolution. The fossils you refer to are cross breads and also the example isn't a human one. There are no human transitional fossils.