Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

"Hot Rod" - Nuclear Orion spacecraft prototype

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
25,880
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 1, 2007

In 1959 this mock-up version of the Orion was launched helping prove the validity of the design.
1 Meter in diameter, weighing 105kg, it was not powered by nuclear blasts but by 1 kilogram balls of C4 explosive. Watch closely and you can see them come out the back.

It reached a height of 105meters.

Read more here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=hot+rod+orion

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (roidroid)

  • @stillustronic You were taught about nuclear propulsion concepts in school?

Top Comments

  • The sad truth here is without the political difficulties this technology would have already been fully developed @second half of the 20th century. We would be all over our solar system by now!

  • This is the Orion nasa should be building.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Project Orion: A Re-Imagining
see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheInternetizen

    it really depends on the implementation.

    An Orion would release less radiation then a typical surface nuclear test as individual bombs would be sub KT devices.

    To equal one Tsar bomba you'd have to launch a lot of them.

    Of course the radiation can be mitigated by providing a steel launch pad or putting it on top of a big chemical rocket and not using the Orion until well above the atmosphere.

  • @AvyScottandFlower More like we would have poisoned ourselves with radiation sickness before we developed anything meaningful.

  • @TheMG2 Have you ever heard of Newton's Third Law of Motion?

    I doubt it, you should look it up and you will see why rockets still work in space and why they can reach such great speeds.

  • @vecaisvecis

    No problem.

    They wouldn't want to leave earth anyway,so then-

    that way,they won't have to suffer from radiation poisoning,either!

    Problem solved.

  • @sicarius100

    That;s a whole lot less explosive energy than all that useless high-altitude nuclear testing they just threw away.

    They should have done some Orion testing then.

  • @ThePingasMightier

    So, as you see, nuclear technology is absent in the one place it should have been developed many decades ago..

    In space

  • @ThePingasMightier Nuclear bombs can be clean, there's little incentive to make them so when they're to be used for blowing things up. For Orion, focused energy bombs, with all of the energy focused at the pressure plate, if the plate utilizes a radiation absorbing material (like depleted Uranium or lead) then there would be minimal radiation, as all of it would be absorbed by the plate.

  • @AvyScottandFlower It's a propulsion system with wonderful potential, but I have concerns about radiation. (Not so much the EMP though.)

    And yes, I'm studying this right now so I would really like a cited response if you have any ideas.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more