Most importantly, is in a free society violence will be seen as imoral and there for evryone will do something about it if a defense agency do try to slave them
I have question stefbot. What keeps companies from not doing what you are sugesting? Absolutely nothing. What prevents coercion? Another form of coercion, be it the law, the threat of bring shot etc.
@N7a7v7i if you want a market that prevents the evolution of financial entities into corporations you have to specifically outline what a corporation is and specifically punish it to ensure it doesn't arise, but this is not a "free market". This is a market free of corporations. Likewise if you want a market free of fraud you have to define & hunt fraud and punish it very very harshly. Fraud gets profits: non-punishment IS ENDORSEMENT, that is human behaviour.
@N7a7v7i corporatism is the collective action of a group as a single business entity and it saves money and amasses power the same way mass-manufacturing gets economies of scale vs hand-made goods. Free-markets offer no restriction against collectively saving money and amassing wealth in this way, meaning everyone needs to do it once the first one does, and it always happens. Limited liability is not required at all for this. Not at all.
@ytgv3fc7 How does corporatism follow from a free market? You seem to be simply stating this as an axiom. Corporations are groups of people given limited liability for their actions by governments... how would this occur without governments in a free market society?
Today's debate in America has been subverted by 100 years of Progressivism, that is, Progressive Communism, infiltrating American institutions ... right into the very halls of Washington DC! Marxist Obama, the socialist White House, and the communist-Democrat majority in Congress are pushing to COLLAPSE the United States Of America from within. Why?
Watch this YouTube video:
watch?v=ukc-z9MmEiU
THE "LOST HISTORY" OF AMERICA'S REPUBLIC :: And The WHY Obama's Rising Marxist Tyranny !!
@PresidentRich I have noticed this assertion is not true at all. I have noticed there are far more starving people in capitalist nations while those who are not starving simply pretend they do not exist. Your corporatist vs capitalist argument is nonsensical - there's no way to have capitalism without corporatism to follow. You'd need additional NON-FREEMARKET principles in place like a ratio of wealth accumulation, not part of capitalism, a hard limit, to stop a corporation from existing.
@lordthawkeye actually a very good point. The only other organized prohibition I've ever heard of is religiously based. I appreciate the correction, this is definitely something to keep in mind as a chain-reaction leverage point.
Most importantly, is in a free society violence will be seen as imoral and there for evryone will do something about it if a defense agency do try to slave them
rodrigodet 2 months ago
I have question stefbot. What keeps companies from not doing what you are sugesting? Absolutely nothing. What prevents coercion? Another form of coercion, be it the law, the threat of bring shot etc.
professornuclearbomb 7 months ago
Is this guy serious? 5 dislikes what the FUCK? I feel like I just got sold a sham-wow. This is nothing more than a Utopian fantasy.
"What's going to keep a billionaire from stockpiling weapons to build his own private army?"
"IT'S JUST NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!"
Jesus...I can't believe people buy into this garbage. Read some real political theory.
cutlerthabear 10 months ago
@N7a7v7i if you want a market that prevents the evolution of financial entities into corporations you have to specifically outline what a corporation is and specifically punish it to ensure it doesn't arise, but this is not a "free market". This is a market free of corporations. Likewise if you want a market free of fraud you have to define & hunt fraud and punish it very very harshly. Fraud gets profits: non-punishment IS ENDORSEMENT, that is human behaviour.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@N7a7v7i corporatism is the collective action of a group as a single business entity and it saves money and amasses power the same way mass-manufacturing gets economies of scale vs hand-made goods. Free-markets offer no restriction against collectively saving money and amassing wealth in this way, meaning everyone needs to do it once the first one does, and it always happens. Limited liability is not required at all for this. Not at all.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7 How does corporatism follow from a free market? You seem to be simply stating this as an axiom. Corporations are groups of people given limited liability for their actions by governments... how would this occur without governments in a free market society?
N7a7v7i 1 year ago
Stefan, I have a question.
Another concern that friends of mine have is how do we get from here to a free society?
Do you have videos on that?
If so, which ones?
I'm an anti-statist myself.
How we get there is also something that gives me an upset stomach.
Surhotchaperchlorome 1 year ago
Today's debate in America has been subverted by 100 years of Progressivism, that is, Progressive Communism, infiltrating American institutions ... right into the very halls of Washington DC! Marxist Obama, the socialist White House, and the communist-Democrat majority in Congress are pushing to COLLAPSE the United States Of America from within. Why?
Watch this YouTube video:
watch?v=ukc-z9MmEiU
THE "LOST HISTORY" OF AMERICA'S REPUBLIC :: And The WHY Obama's Rising Marxist Tyranny !!
CrimeIncObama 1 year ago
@PresidentRich I have noticed this assertion is not true at all. I have noticed there are far more starving people in capitalist nations while those who are not starving simply pretend they do not exist. Your corporatist vs capitalist argument is nonsensical - there's no way to have capitalism without corporatism to follow. You'd need additional NON-FREEMARKET principles in place like a ratio of wealth accumulation, not part of capitalism, a hard limit, to stop a corporation from existing.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@lordthawkeye actually a very good point. The only other organized prohibition I've ever heard of is religiously based. I appreciate the correction, this is definitely something to keep in mind as a chain-reaction leverage point.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago