Top Comments
All Comments (5,464)
-
Wow good for Ford. It's nice to know that finally, muscle cars...well, at least the mustang...can compete against an M3, the benchmark super coupe.
-
So funny that people bash Ford because its getting better and better and there is almost no differents between the two cars.. Bmw isn't much better, it costs more and thats it, people who have knowledge of cars knows it
-
@hyttekeld BMW costs way more and is a ugly car
-
US test. Mustang Win´s....... Jaaaa right - only in the big fantasy land "USA"
BUY THE BMW
-
CLEARLY BIASED.
-
@GMguy91 and as a Ford fan I applaud GM for bringing back the Camaro in such an awesome way; in many ways it forced Ford to make a better Mustang; competition makes everyone better!
-
ls 302 mustang totally obliterates the m3 on the track, for still a fraction of the price
-
Ford....I am impressed. And that is coming from a pretty big Chevy fan. I have heard almost nothing negative about the new Mustang GT. I applaud Ford for making a good car for a reasonable price!
-
you can get a fully loaded mustang with alot of the same features as the m3 for 20 grand less. with bmw you pay for the name. not sayin its a bad car just a little overpriced in my opinion
-
so let me get this straight....the mustang wins in 0-60, 1/4 miles, lateral grip, braking all at a cost of $27000.00 less than the M3...and just because the M3 is .09 sec quicker in a race over a minute long you declare it the winner!? WTF!? That just sounded stupid when I was typing it. Could you possibly have been any more biased? Maybe I can remind you of the $230.00 oil changes or the 5K clutch replacement in the M3. M3 is a nicer car overall, but this is a performance test, base it on that!
Ok Ford.....I am impressed.
XriddimXkillaX 1 week ago 10
if i had 60k i would buy the mustang gt n spend the rest on pcp
Okay931 4 days ago 8