Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

SuperSense by Bruce M. Hood

ON SALE NOW! Browse Inside the book: http://browseinside.harperc... John McEnroe notoriously refused to step on the white lines of a tennis court between points. Wade Boggs insisted on eating a ch...  
 
Customize

More From: harperonevideo

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
6 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,547 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (5)   Options

Loading...
blueeye007 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
supernatural or not... what is supernatural? Is remote viewing supernatural??? Many would say it is. I learned it from a man teaching it for 20 years in FBI. I am not supernatural but after i learned his technique I saw and heared as well as smelled things which where my target I literarly described it and painted it. I belive in remote viewing because I suprised myself that those abillities are learnable by everyone.
eoosen (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
cogito2, you're supporting Hood's thesis.
brucehood9 (10 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They might but I doubt it as it would require a complete revision of our current scientific understanding. Simply put these demonstrations do not reliably replicate. If they did, there would be a Nobel Prize in it for the discover, not to mention a huge wad of cash. No I wonder what I would remote view?????
cogito2 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Some people are working on such a revision -- such things do happen, and fundamental physics is in quite a state of disarray at this time. Taking up your argument though, since what is commonly characterised as 'falling in love' is something that is hard to reproduce reliably, should we conclude that people who believe that it does happen are deluding themselves? Or do different rules apply there?
cogito2 (10 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Re supersense: When the BBC tried to replicate remote viewing, in a programme in which I had a part, the drawings and narratives produced by their research assistant as viewer seem to fit remarkably well what was at the actual location, picked out of 4 in just one trial (to see a clip, search at Google Video for Successful Remote Viewing Experiment on TV). How do you explain that, Bruce: illusory correlation, fluke, fraud by the BBC? Or might some people actually be able to view things remotely?

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.