Jenna Wolfe-Stephen King Interview 11-13-11
Top Comments
All Comments (22)
-
@Arcadia2012 dude, it's a fictional book review...your problem is some bullshit about slow motion footage and NOT the time traveling part?!? ROFL
-
I found out what 11/22/63 means
-
@tatchip Totally agree. Stephen King is certainly an immersive type of writer.
-
I'm just reading this book, not finished yet. So far nothing special, very banal time traveller story. I've always respected Stephen King and his writing style. But this is ridiculous! Especially since he tries to imply in his novel that Oswald, as a lone nut, killed Kennedy on his own. That's utterly unbelievable. Without even taking a look at the details of Kennedy's assassination, one only has to watch the Zapruder film in slow motion to realize he was shot from FRONT, not BEHIND. Bullshit!
-
thankyou for your eloquent opinion Wayne next time I have a conviction I will temper it with your infinite wisdom
-
@sveilleux91 wow I think I'm even less enthused about it now
-
@09nob great reason not to read the book, not.
-
...John Kennedy was this world's last gunslinger...
-
I'm a big fan of king but I think he's barking up the wrong tree on this one as far as Oswald being the lone gun man, it seems so ludicrous I won't be reading the book.
I think with most long fiction (600+ pages), you hit some sections of the books, where people will say, "Man this is boring". In my opinion, like with most great stuff, the devil is in the details. Some people call it boring, I try to call it details. After reading, I realize that those details made it a much richer reading experience.
tatachip 3 months ago 6
Just read the 1st 2 chapters. So far so very good. King seems to be at his best writing about the 50s. I wont spoil by saying why the 50s in a book about JFK assassination.
PunkersTV 3 months ago 2