Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Marbury v. Madison

Equal Justice Under Law Marbury v. Madison (1st in a 4 part series). Dramatizations of historic decisions from the courtroom of America's great Chief Justice, John Marshall. Who determines what ...  
 
Customize
Donate to this organization

More From: PublicResourceOrg

Loading...

Playlist(76)

33:31
35:28
1:13:16
35:36
1:34:38
50:49
1:22:45
1:02:08
43:15
47:14
59:58
1:14:10
45:44
1:32:29
1:11:24
1:11:22
1:06:09
53:06
3:26
1:42

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
34 ratings
Sign in to rate
15,227 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (26)   Options

Loading...
b6721 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Is it madness Mr. President?"

"Madness? THIS IS THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH!"
danceonyourhead (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yay poli sci classes! videos like these really are amazing for that purpose... I'm doing the same thing right now, only mine's in about 3 hours!
darlingnose (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yay for this vid! it has officially helped me with the poli sci test i have to take tomorrow morning.
kgj08 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
eh.. the Court only didn't have the jurisdiction because Marshall said that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. Most scholars agree that it wasn't and the Court did in fact have jurisdiction. Marshall was just trying to avoid a heated political battle.
Lycan220 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If Marbury Vs Madison didnt happen, the power of judicial review would have come up again in Gibbons vs Ogden.
laferrerrivera (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I second ur comment, it may have it's faults but it's still the best system till this day.
juanmsj (4 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Lo que nadie sabe es que tanto Marbury como Madison eran gays, y a su vez, Madison estaba enamorado de Jefferson. Esto fue lo que desato el conflicto. El caso en verdad deberia llamarse "Marbury y Madison por siempre", for ever... como oportunamente lo dijo Adams.
SpottedTiger89 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
BAAAAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!! OMG! AHAHAHAH! Too funny, man... too funny!
juanmsj (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
really?
Aye90125 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Actually, Chief Justice Marshall said Yes.
His ruling regarding the constitutionality was correct, However:
After the case, he urged Jefferson to grant them, but the President decided to be a douche about it and continued to ignore them.

You failed to address the comment entirely.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.