"Creation Science 101" by Roy Zimmerman

http://www.royzimmerman.com/

Please subscribe to my Channel

"Creation Science 101" is on my album "Faulty Intelligence" available on my website and on iTunes.

Category:

Music

Tags:

• satire
• songs
• creationism
• intelligent
• design
• evolution
• lehrer

[MoralRapist]

religion: because thinking is hard!

[psycotria]

To really understand Evolution, there are many other areas one must also have at least basic understanding of.

To really, really, really believe in Creationism, one need not KNOW or Understand much at all. The Less, the Better!

The more scientifically literate one is, the less likely one to believe Gods & Creationism.

[Thechristiancullen]

@tdjdk Firslty, evolution is not exclusive to atheism

2/ Evolution is debated within christianity

3/ Evolution like calivinsm are not issues of salvation

4/ More scientific evidence is casting doubts on the theory of macro evolution, for example: The Fossil Record, Living "Fossils", The Cambrian Explosion, New T.Rex Discoveries, "Missing Links" etc.

5/ Most scientists who queitly acknowledge that many areas of evolution are still a research issue - it is only atheists who are ignorant

[tdjdk]

@Kerberoz01

And the crocoduck is the very thing that would disprove evolution. These dimwits don't even know, that the very thing they DEMAND to prove evolution is the very thing that would DISPROVE evolution. I doubt they understand the depth of their ignorance. If they demand that dogs give birth to cats to prove evolution, they have understood absolutely ZERO about evolution. So which is it? Are they breaching the 9th commandment knowlingly or because of ignorance?

[tdjdk]

@Thechristiancullen

Go away troll, you are SO easily recognized it's embarassing, even to your quote mining peers

[tdjdk]

@Thechristiancullen

... ah, quote mining again, are we? You MUST be a religious fanatic. Such a poor tactic, and so frequently used by the loosing side in an argument. Why don't you also quote the rest of his statement? Obviously because that would excempt you from quote mining, and quote mining is clearly your agenda here

[Thechristiancullen]

@Kerberoz01 Sir Fred Hoyle, of Cambridge University stated that statistically the chances of one cell evolving was the same as a tornado passing through a junkyard and giving you a fully functional Boeing 747.

[Kerberoz01]

@TheAsaoirc creationists will just tell you that fruit flies are all the same "kind" and won't be happy until you show them a lobster giving birth to a jaguar.

[Kerberoz01]

@Thechristiancullen I'm pretty sure no one has ever counted to a trillion, either. By your logic, that would make its existence a research issue.

[Thechristiancullen]

@TheAsaoirc Only smug atheists would regard this as fact - most scientists would still quietly regard this as a research issue. Under normal circumstances, creatures give birth to the same kind of creatures. It is established scientific fact that like begets like. If the DNA in an embryo is damaged, results in a mutant child that differs in some respect from its parent. Although a few mutations have been scientifically observed that are beneficial, most mutations produce inferior offspring.

[TheAsaoirc]

@Thechristiancullen Except it has. There have been numerous studies where they bred fruit flies and they reached several points where the current generation couln't mate with prior generations. That, in the broadest sense, is speciation. once you have that, it's easy enough to see the new 'species' of fruit fly having a different probiscus(for example) and hence a different species

[Thechristiancullen]

@Kerberoz01 It has never been observed in any laboratory that mutations can cause one species to turn into another. Despite this, you atheists believe that given enough time, some animals will eventually evolve into other creatures.