Creationists Hugh Ross vs Kent Hovind debate the age of the earth. Ross, a popular creationist astronomer says its 4.54 billion years and Hovind says its 6,000. This is from television in 2000.
Look at Kent hovind's switch at 0:20... From firmly believing that entropy could not be there before the fall of man (Look at the other vids before this) To someone who doesn't know and only believes.
I find this discussion hilarious...arguing over whose interpretation of the Bible is correct...lmao. Hugh only needs to use science to back up age of earth. Hovind has no real legit scientific claims accepted within peer-reviewed journals to support why age of earth is wrong.
Praise the Lord! mr. kent hovind have big point, creation is true. mr. hugh ross is confussion, he distorted the Holy Bible example how old is adam when God created, do adam created in one thousand years or more before he became man, or just one day.
Actually Kent Hovind, Hugh Ross's "teaching" encourages me as a believer to pursue science and understanding the Mighty Creator through all the amazing things He has made. It doesn't lead me away from my faith.
Hmm.... Kent Hovind. Not only stupid but smug too. I guess that's his Young Earth Evangelical Delusion causing the glazed eye "lights are on but nobody's home" effect.
@tot792 where in evolution does man come from monkey... you idot... we came from homo erectus you said you are made in the image of god so what bout just to feel your insecurity
Sorry I ment at 0:15
RahxephonXtra 9 hours ago
Look at Kent hovind's switch at 0:20... From firmly believing that entropy could not be there before the fall of man (Look at the other vids before this) To someone who doesn't know and only believes.
RahxephonXtra 9 hours ago
I find this discussion hilarious...arguing over whose interpretation of the Bible is correct...lmao. Hugh only needs to use science to back up age of earth. Hovind has no real legit scientific claims accepted within peer-reviewed journals to support why age of earth is wrong.
Casshyr 3 weeks ago
Praise the Lord! mr. kent hovind have big point, creation is true. mr. hugh ross is confussion, he distorted the Holy Bible example how old is adam when God created, do adam created in one thousand years or more before he became man, or just one day.
mon69alejo 3 weeks ago
Actually Kent Hovind, Hugh Ross's "teaching" encourages me as a believer to pursue science and understanding the Mighty Creator through all the amazing things He has made. It doesn't lead me away from my faith.
PLURIC 1 month ago in playlist Kent Hovind vs Hugh Ross debate (disc 2 of 2)
@tot792 Way to be humble and gentle. Be quiet, you are making us look bad.
Hayesmarkham 2 months ago
@tot792 cognitive dissonance ftw. We are apes. end of the line.
fenix144 2 months ago
Hmm.... Kent Hovind. Not only stupid but smug too. I guess that's his Young Earth Evangelical Delusion causing the glazed eye "lights are on but nobody's home" effect.
CarajilloDulce 3 months ago
You are both wrong about Adam
rummiena 4 months ago
@tot792 where in evolution does man come from monkey... you idot... we came from homo erectus you said you are made in the image of god so what bout just to feel your insecurity
randallfe 4 months ago