Police Internal Affairs Interview Part 5 / 5
Loading...
Uploaded by freedommv1 on Sep 26, 2008
This is part 5/5, the final segment of the 5 part series that stemmed from this incident. This segment begins with me asking the cops about the California Supreme Court ruling regarding free speech in shopping malls. Info:
----
Original Incident:
Cops Don't Like Being Filmed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YLdqTbmwjE
Police Internal Affairs Interview -Part 1/5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10w-v-2hIt8
Police Internal Affairs Interview Part 2 / 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j7z5TZ7-us
Police Internal Affairs Interview Part 3 / 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGGSImKATfs
Police Internal Affairs Interview -Part 4/5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RdPa69Mh3s
Police Internal Affairs Interview -Part 5/5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI1q8CFijL4
----
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/12/california-shop.html
In Fashion Valley Mall v. NLRB, the California Supreme Court (4-3) reaffirmed its earlier Pruneyard rule. As described by BNA's Daily Labor Report (subscription required):
[The Court, in an opinion written by Justice Moreno,] said that the state constitution provides that any person may "speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects," and that "[a] law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press." In Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 23 Cal. 3d 899 (Cal. 1979), Moreno said, California's high court held that the state constitution provided broader protection for free expression than the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and that the state constitution protected speech and petitioning in shopping centers even when they were privately owned. . . .
..."A shopping mall is a public forum in which persons may reasonably exercise their right to free speech guaranteed by article I, section 2 of the California Constitution," Moreno wrote. "Shopping malls may enact and enforce reasonable regulations of the time, place and manner of such free expression to assure that these activities do not interfere with the normal business operations of the mall, but they may not prohibit certain types of speech based upon its content, such as prohibiting speech that urges a boycott of one or more of the stores in the mall," he added.
------
Also: Court allows free speech on private-property malls http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20071225-9999-1m25mall.html
Uploader Comments (freedommv1)
All Comments (7)
-
feel good smoooosh job. as stated on the first vid, these cats ARE NOT internal affairs. i been threw it. you have to call your state capital. real internal affairs live to sqwash tough guy,dirty cops. atleast the one i delt with did. yes or no, right or wrong, it goes on their record that they were investigated. cops hate internal affairs.
-
Looks like the report was taken seriously, and hopefully at least in your area, policy will be improved. The police have a lot of negative PR to over come(well deserved), right now I think their major issue is winning back the law abiding public's trust.
Thank you for taking time to file a report, and go to the interview, we all need to be civically responsible and motivated to take time from your life to see something like this all the way through. Well Done Sir.
-
@freedommv1 i think you did a fine job i wish we had more like you that isn't afraid of the police back in the 1960,s we tried fighting back and made a little difference but now its the younger generation turn to speak up and not be afraid of the cops. here in TN its really bad its almost a police state and people who live here are scared to go against the police and there newly installed puppet governor who is just a stooge for the FOP AND POLICE my generation has died out so keep up the work
-
Favorited!
-
@Clamchuck Go lick a cops boots, you ignorant coward.
-
Ron Paul!
Woohooo!
3:05
It's not illegal to videotape policeby PoliceWatchCentre158,636 views- 4:14
Riverside street racing police bustby deon95179,082 views
- 1:05
Choose to Refuse: DC Metro Searchesby bureaucrash131,255 views
- 6:04
Police Internal Affairs Interview Part 4 / 5by freedommv1297 views
- 1:35
Modesto CopWatch -Sheriff illegally takes cameraby RHHRorg18,587 views
- 1:45
Internal Affairsby wogboxer9,452 views
- 1:29
idiots busted stealing part 2by mugencivic88803 views
- 6:01
Ex-cop Barry Cooper stings local officers KVUE news 5/10/10by nevergetbusted37,959 views
- 10:01
Rookie Cop Bullies Mike Hanson For Videotaping Police Activityby MikeHansonArchives87,122 views
- 2:27
[TX] 3. Officer Jamie Ellyn Goodan killed, husband arrested.by cloudwriter321 views
- 8:24
InJustice_0001.wmvby gibscm1467 views
- 6:38
Vehicle Search and Seizureby mcutaia819,748 views
- 4:43
Police can enter your homeby nomorepolicestate9,111 views
- 2:01
Internal Affairsby spiritx3334,747 views
- 6:56
Why Are You Filming The Bridge? Became Why Are You Filming the Police Car Accidentby RadioReporter0133,825 views
- 1:07
Assault by Plano Texas Officer January 10 2009by 4theA9,806 views
- 7:43
PFO Travel Vlog: Moreno Valleyby bollweevilboogie3,792 views
- 4:06
Another great Josh Log, October 24th, 2008by charlievancamp131 views
- 3:30
Siskel and Ebert: Internal Affairsby GoFuckYourselfBiatch25,642 views
I just watched over 40+ minutes of you waisting the City of West Covina's time.
The officer did nothing wrong except get uner your skin. Get thicker skin dude. Better yet walk a mile in cops boots.
Clamchuck 3 years ago
It's not about brushing off public servants annoying behavior. the reason the coward was afraid to give his name, (which is illegal) is because he's probably used to acting like a bully thug and was afraid to stand up and ID himself when called on it. Do some research on probable cause and natural rights. Our rights are inherent, granted by Almighty God. They are not privileges granted by a socialist "papa government" or a beat cop. Cops and government are servants of the people, not vice versa.
freedommv1 3 years ago