Casey Anthony: Reverse Speech Reveals Reasonable Doubt to Murder
Uploader Comments (ShawnHS)
Video Responses
All Comments (85)
-
@ShawnHS Yeah that's why a lot of people doubt reverse speech and call it some kind of retarded science. They aren't musicians or audio techs so they don't understand how to hear it properly. Kudos on this vid.
-
what really happened it seems like the mom and brother know something.
-
Please, please, please do one on George Anthony!
-
But you all missed the part when she says backwards" I Killed her.I killed her (giggles) and I do'nt care" I wiil walk,I sold my soul to the DEVIL. I heard her clearly.Did any one else hear it ?
-
I agree!
-
I just read this article online that says that there is sealed evidence from the case that suggests exactly what these reversals say. However, if Casey WAS pimping out Caylee (which led to her death).... Casey still should be guilty of that.
-
Wow! Interesting stuff! I have to check this new science out.
-
Casey Anthony offered $1 million for interview that will ‘grill her like a bad piece of fish’
DON'T WATCH ANY INTERVIEW WITH CASEY ANTHONY. THE DAY TURN OFF UR TV.
-
You should do reverse speech on Cindy Anthony
-
interesting seeing this was made before the verdict, maybe she was telling the truth, either way she knew and did nothing about it..
It is scary when you gotta slow it down three times like that
vicritt23 2 years ago 5
Not intended to be scary. Since people aren't used to hearing a speech reversal, slowing it down to different speeds helps one's ear to adjust to the sound.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Everything...why don't we wait for all the "hard" evidence to come in and let a jury decide.I think you'll be on the short end because Casey is,at the very least, going to get life but most likely it will be the needle for her.She deserves it because she is guilty.I don't expect to see reverse speach on the evidence list and even if it was,it would be the laughing stock of the trial.Because it is worthless.I'm not going to waste another moment on this stupid subject its a bore.
berryz61 2 years ago
You're pretty worked up about a subject you consider a bore. Please refer to my first comment on this thread!
Go to my Backward State website, Examples page, Under Crime In The News go to the Gary Hilton link. He confessed to a murder, led authorities to the body (eliminates false confession, wrongly convicted theory), & was convicted for the crime in the court of law. 5 out of 5 reversals clearly indicate he was directly involved in the crime. He also reveals involvement in other murders.
ShawnHS 2 years ago 3
Finding the reversals before, or after his conviction doesn't change the "hard" evidence of the content of his reversals. The reverse speech from a convicted murderer is validated as accurate, but the reversals of Casey who is indicating someone else is involved are suddenly invalid?
5 for 5 reversals for a convicted person showing direct involvement, & nearly 4 dozen reversals from Casey which dont show direct involvement, but according to you (& others) she is clearly guilty of murder?
ShawnHS 2 years ago 3
I see my reply was not posted so now I guess you decide who sees what and if not in your favor well........that is pathetic.
berryz61 2 years ago
What are you talking about? Anything you have posted is here. By the way, what does the existence and accuracy of something have to do with whether or not it is used in a courtroom?
ShawnHS 2 years ago 2