Burning Down The New York Times: Act II "What Holocaust?"
Top Comments
All Comments (38)
-
The NYT: just as great today as it was back then.
-
Let's not forget that while Stalin was deliberately starving millions of Ukrainians to death, the POS FDR pushed through the "Agricultural Adjustment Act", that paid farmers who agreed to reduce their harvest, & severely punished those that didn't.
SCOTUS found the AAA unconstitutional, but FDR found ways around their ruling & when SCOTUS was poised to slap FDR's nonsense down, FDR threatened to all but dismantle the court, publicly & repeatedly.
Also, read H.G. Wells interview w/Stalin.
-
Roger is such a sexy Alpha.
YUMMY
-
PJTV is hopefully a sign of what professionals intend for the internet. Absolutely great! Im not sure which arena they may be included in for recognition.
Emmy perhaps, or Pulitzer? Just a matter of time though....
-
Walter Duranty, the NYT's "Our Man in Hell."
See:
3dubyasdawt duranty dawtcalm
-
Purge the traitors from our midst.
-
the NEW YORK TIMES is AIPAC bitch , thats it !!!!!!!!!!
-
Well, "burnt" because that's what it literally meant. Genocide is mass slaughter. It's also quite horrid. "Holocaust" became more of a term so to speak.
-
A holocaust doesn't have to mean with fire. It can be any mass slaughter of life. But admittedly it's probably not something you're accustomed to hearing about the Soviet Union. It wasn't as widely reported, thanks to the likes of Walter Duranty, because they were in love with the idea of communism. What they don't tell you was these folks were in love with fascism and Nazism too. Until Hitler invated Russia, they didn't have a problem with him.
-
O.K.! You see the word holocaust means completely burnt. So as you can see it makes sense that what the Nazis did in death camps was holocaustic (lol). I guess when the KKK would burn blacks and Jews alive it would be called that, too. Unless the Ukranians were burned I wouln't have a reason to call it that.
The NY Times is garbage!
AaronShaunBrennan 2 years ago 24
I remember doing research on both the Soviet and Nazi holocausts in college, pointing out extensively how the NYT and other papers distinctively omitted such news or glossed over it with benign terms meant to mislead readers. My own professors couldn't believe it, but there it was. Admittedly, even I thought, at the time, that there might've been some national security angle for it, but looking at it now as a professional I know otherwise. Sometimes, people put on blinders.
WayfinderX 2 years ago 19