Ed Schultz Compares Armed Obama Protester To Brian Nichols
Top Comments
All Comments (363)
-
@NUTCASE71733 the fact you think anybody owns a rail gun is a joke right? the students at columbine had shotguns and revilvers along with a 92sf and a mac10 semi auto. they got the guns through a 18 year olf friend who was leagle but the boys where not( he did not know). the point is is it was negligable the guns the boys had. i shoot ar15 almost every day and they are safe guns.. that shotgun or simple revolver shoots bullets aswell. it is proof gun control does not work.
-
That may be true, but since when are assault rifles, machine guns, rail guns, and other excessively powerful firearms sane, and safe, for public use? Didn't the columbine shooters have automatic weapons? Weapons of that callibur should be kept out of the public's hands because there's gonna be some idiot who's gonna cause more trouble than he normally would with a NORMAL firearm like a shotgun or a simple revolver.
-
This guy claims to be a gun owner, but calls a gun with a gun a psycho? They couldnt grab a gun from a cop? This guys logic eludes me..
-
@bjoh249 I've only watched Glen Beck about three times or so but I've never seen him feign such stupidity.
(Boy, is that ever an attack op. for Beck haters!) grin
The liberals complain so much because they're deceived and they don't want to miss ANY opportunity to deceive others.
-
I stopped at :29 seconds. It seemed there is no reason to listen any further to this man who is clearly a liar -- no one that has a video presence with a major network can get to his position and be as thick and stupid as he's claiming to me.
Here's only one answer among many to your pretense of idiocy, Ed: He wants to exercise his rights lest he lose them.
-
So he is suggesting police officers shouldn't carry guns since anyone could take it and go on a shooting rampage... IT HAS HAPPENED< No....it hasn't.
-
Ed is right it could happen, but does that mean we should not allow our law enforcement officers to carry weapons as well? It's a pretty weak argument for a worst case scenario that almost never happens.
-
"What if someone snatches the gun from you and starts shooting?" See? They're always looking for ways to strip us of our gun rights.
Hey ass hole! The 2nd amendment is not for hunting it is for self defense from invaders and the government
xxbryan715xx 6 months ago 4
Ed Schultz is acutally arguing that the guards shouldnt have weapon for defending the president, since its possible for people to hi-jack a guard and shoot officials. lulz
larsiemannen 5 months ago