Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pt 2 AT LAST!!!! Non-LDS Egyptologist AGREES with Joseph Smith!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
884 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 9, 2009

Discussing Lanny Bell's amazing insights about Facsimile 1 in the Book of Abraham...

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheBackyardProfessor)

  • If one properly understands the fruits of Egyptology, one understands that the JS trans. of the facsimiles in the BoA are unreliable. Are there false claims on both sides...yes. The irony of claiming truth is that one must also be open to the possibility that said claim is wrong (scholars and prophets). In my observation, scientific theory provides a better set of checks and balances than religion in this regard. It is troubling when Mythos and Logos mix. Mormonism was born from the cocktail.

  • @fudley2003

    I do understand the fruits of Egyptology, and also that Joseph Smith's translations are not unreliable.

  • @TheBackyardProfessor Just so I understand your statement, are you saying specifically that the JS translations of the facsimiles in the BoA are reliable? Or is it a blanket statement surrounding his translations in general (a small part being the facsimiles)? Am I making a wrong assumption?

  • @fudley2003

    Can you show that they are unreliable? With Egyptian evidence?

  • @TheBackyardProfessor Could you please answer my question about your statement? I'm just trying to understand you position.

    To answer your question:

    The very scholar you're quoting, Bell, would argue that the JS translations of the facsimiles in the BoA are unreliable even though he discusses (at times) that some critics are not 100% accurate. Am I off here?

  • @fudley2003

    Is Bell himself the FINAL answer? Does he know ***ALL*** there is to know about these particular facsimiles, and how they relate with other Egyptian literature? Is he familiar with ALL the LDS scholarly materials on these issues? Is he well read in ALL the Abraham literature available these days? Does any one singular individual have the FINAL say so on this?

see all

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is this egyptologist a mormon? or paid by the mormon church? I think the Tanners are awesome. maybe you should ask why they left the church

  • Lanny Bell is not agreeing with Joseph Smith. He's pointing out minor errors of other critics. Again, your arrogance on this issue is premature.

    As soon as Dr. Bell says the papyrus is about Abraham, then you're on to something. Otherwise these videos are doing the church a huge disservice.

  • @TheBackyardProfessor

    Answers: No, No, No, No, and No. Please see my first remark to understand the context in which I agree with you.

    So I ask you again:

    Are you saying specifically that the JS translations of the facsimiles in the BoA are reliable, or was your previous statement regarding his translations a comment on his works as a whole (a small part being the facsimiles)?

  • Keep the stone rolling!! For every 1 anti mormon who mocks your videos, 10 more people are enlightened by the truth displayed in your work! Make them howl!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more