Frank Turek vs. Christopher Hitchens (II): What Best Explains Reality - Theism or Atheism?
Top Comments
All Comments (1,128)
-
Scuba, don't worry, most people see frank for the retarded tool he is.
-
wrong frank thermodynamics does NOT prevent the universe from expanding and contracting and expanding again in an endless cycle.
secondly frank if time had a beginning then by definition there was no change before time began, if there is no change then NOTHING AND NO-ONE COULD CREATE OR CAUSE ANYTHING
-
frank your false dichotomy fools no one
-
"john wasn't there?" john demonstrably did not write john. a he was dead, b john changes in literature styles in dramatic ways giving evidence that john has multiple authors
-
yay 46 minutes in and what i predicted has happened. frank has violated the law of causality that his entire argument is based upon.
-
gah ffs no morality isn't objective we are taught it by SOCIETY and its a trial and error development process
-
dna information comparisons are METAPHORS intended to make it easier to explain jesus does frank not understand the idea of metaphors?
-
I think Frank Turek composed himself and presented his points extremely well... for a religious adherent.
-
Do you think that the delusional believer in supernatural fairytales drinks a little too much coffee? Isn't it just a plain old miracle that the sky-spook clearly communicated with Turek but kind of ignored me and Hitchens. Turek is so lucky to have met the one and only sky-fairy. Well, good for Frank. There is no way that he could have just talked himself into his religious beliefs.
-
@BtArocks3133 if by divine revelation you mean God then there's nothing wrong with that. Why would we even believe that logic even make sense in a naturalistic universe?
- Loading comment...
8 minutes in and already facepalming. Hitchens is gonna eat this guy alive.
NirvanaFan5000 3 weeks ago 6
Wow, I can see why Turek was so keen to have a closing statement, nothing like emotional blackmail despite the anecdote being applicable to Hitchens' point, where moralism and theism are not mutually inclusive entities. Trust such a poorly reasoned, incongruous statement to come from that liar and hypocrite.
philpotsly 1 week ago 5