new transitional fossil for evolution

new transitional fossil

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• transitional
• fossil
• evolution
• creation

[lesouder2222]

22 million years ago is too late. This Turtle could have evolved from Normal looking turtles. 220 million years would make a lot more sense. Turtles are older then dinosaurs or crocs

[mp9yq9tx]

yeah you are right. i have a caption stating this on the clip. mabye you missed it.

[SpeakerForrTheDead]

And excellent vid, mp9yq9tx.

Thanks for the share.

[mp9yq9tx]

glad you liked it......:)

[deadman1144]

a you said it was 22 million years old did you mean that it's 220 million years old? because that's what it's says on Wikipedia.

[mp9yq9tx]

oops....yes its 220 million years.

[beyondbedandbathisme]

To all religious nutters . . . every single life-form is a transitional fossil. Even humans are between our ancestor specie and our descendant specie. You want a transitional? Look in the mirror. Or look at any animal alive or dead. Evolution never stops.

[Freeze01]

ah but that is where you go wrong in your thinking. The fossils you would like to see as proof for evolution would in fact disprove evolution.

Evolution is tiny steps from an ancestral form towards other forms that is why every fossil found is in fact a transitional form, its between what came before and what came after it. And yes this will of course be fully developed animals but with characteristics going towards species X.

There will never be found a crocaduck, it is a fallcious concept.

[OptimalElement]

@sugarhitman

I got more important things to think about.

[sugarhitman]

@OptimalElement Think about it.

[OptimalElement]

@sugarhitman

Well let it be a peer reviewed website. But what exactly are you trying to show me????

[sugarhitman]

@OptimalElement This is a peer reviewed article...if you dont want to accept that, thats your problem. *smile*

[OptimalElement]

@sugarhitman

Yes, Digital Library for Physics and Astronomy. So what exactly you trying to show me?

[sugarhitman]

@OptimalElement Oh ye of little trust...here you go: adsabsDOTharvardDOTedu/abs/200­5Sci...307DOT1952S

[OptimalElement]

@sugarhitman

I asked for a scientific paper, not a news paper. If I am to learn or discuss such topics as geology or taxonomy I would deal with experts in that field, not bunch of journalists who always like to misquote and twist facts just to make a good story. Its no wonder the public is confused about things such as stem cell research, vaccines and global warming.

[sugarhitman]

@OptimalElement Me lie? "I always tell the truth, even when I lie".

wwwDOTguardianDOTcoDOTuk/scien­ce/2007/apr/13/uknewsDOTtaxono­my

Enjoy my friend. *smile

[OptimalElement]

@sugarhitman

LOL mate... your last comment is complete full of bullshit. And the dinosaur DNA analyzed???!!!! When? Can you sent me a link to a scientific paper? Or did some preacher just pulled it out the DNA out of his ass?

[sugarhitman]

@OptimalElement LOL! Many dinosaur fossils as found by spotting bones protruding from the surface...hardly the "Jurassic" layer. LOL! Also, recently, it has finally been confirmed that the soft tissue of a T-Rex fossil was indeed soft tissue, enabling scientists to map it's DNA.

Reptiles transitioning into mammals is an example of animals evolving outside their Taxonomic group. Or maybe humans and fish are members of the same taxonomic group? *smile*