hey man this might sound weird but federer ferrero coulda been a good rivalry in the 03/04 years if ferrero never got injured. they had some nice matches
@89Pleasek you are an idiot. Federer dominated in an era of no stars. This is why I respect Nadal so much. He was just 18 or so and was stopping feder.
Forgot to mention another mental case, Berdych, in the top 10. Even Soderling wouldn't be top 10 had he played 5 years ago during Federer's prime years. Turns out that not only is the competition better now, it's far worse than when Federer was racking up Slam after Slam around 2004-2006.
And another epic fail in your comment. Nadal has been winning Slams since 2005 FO and since then Federer has won 12 Slams compared to 9.
what bullshit, Safin, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Roddick, Coria, Ferrero, Davydenko all in their prime years + still well playing Agassi, Henman, Moya, Kuerten and tons of other contenders like Ljubicic, Gonzalez or Blake . With all respect but who's in the top 10 now? Almagro, Fish, Melzer, Ferrer, Verdasco? DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH. Other than the big 3 (even though Federer is 30 years old now) there is no competition, Murray is a mental case, Del Po could be a threat but he's constantly inured
@TheTiger1590 it does sound weird
trenis 4 months ago
hey man this might sound weird but federer ferrero coulda been a good rivalry in the 03/04 years if ferrero never got injured. they had some nice matches
TheTiger1590 6 months ago
wow... thats crazy, such good players
dazzleglass75 6 months ago
@89Pleasek you are an idiot. Federer dominated in an era of no stars. This is why I respect Nadal so much. He was just 18 or so and was stopping feder.
Globox822 7 months ago
@89Pleasek Amen!
Stylaz21 8 months ago
Forgot to mention another mental case, Berdych, in the top 10. Even Soderling wouldn't be top 10 had he played 5 years ago during Federer's prime years. Turns out that not only is the competition better now, it's far worse than when Federer was racking up Slam after Slam around 2004-2006.
And another epic fail in your comment. Nadal has been winning Slams since 2005 FO and since then Federer has won 12 Slams compared to 9.
You're an epic fail.
89Pleasek 9 months ago
what bullshit, Safin, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Roddick, Coria, Ferrero, Davydenko all in their prime years + still well playing Agassi, Henman, Moya, Kuerten and tons of other contenders like Ljubicic, Gonzalez or Blake . With all respect but who's in the top 10 now? Almagro, Fish, Melzer, Ferrer, Verdasco? DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH. Other than the big 3 (even though Federer is 30 years old now) there is no competition, Murray is a mental case, Del Po could be a threat but he's constantly inured
89Pleasek 9 months ago
That point is a microcosm of their rivalry, Nadal simply being better in the end. And if you don't like it go suck a dick.
TorgeistLLN 1 year ago
@AwantedNinja -Yeah, but when he won that Grandslams?? When Nadal was like 18?! And Murray & Djoković also.. He had no real concurency.
Vultur31 1 year ago
@Vultur31 I would believe you if Nadal won more grandslams than Federer which he won't.
AwantedNinja 1 year ago