@wildlettuce What regulations could settle disputes quicker and more effectively? States give validity to ICC, but then turn on the whole process when someone calls them out. It's not a question of defense BTW. It has to do with agreed upon treaties/resolutions on 5/4 key issues. But let's end the discussion here.. It will be hard for me to keep up in this form. If you could PM with a response it would make it easier for me to respond to at a later time.
@wildlettuce I agree. There are many problems with International Law, however States interestingly enough use the institution regularly. Keep in mind States infringe not just Int Law, but own state laws. America uses the term sovereignty like China, France, Russia and UK to get away with abiding by laws however, ask yourself if the conclusions are just "based on domestic policies/laws and your values".
@Alpinex105 as i said, i dont think democracy is the ultimate solution, but it have to do until we find something better.
the problem the international law is that its not clear who should/does abide by it, whether there's anyone actually enforcing it, and what are the 'punishments'.
when china invades another country (tibet) for expansion purposes, occupies it & burns the local culture, intl law doesnt exist. but when israel defends itself all of the sudden intl law is very clear.
He says even if the charges are false.
Maybe the charges aren't false.
bornbillsmith 2 days ago
@triplecheck4 200 lies doesn't compare to israel 2 million plus an going lies.
CondorDMaDnD2ed 4 days ago
@triplecheck4 They got nothing on israel.
CondorDMaDnD2ed 4 days ago
bunch of jerks, Chomsky and the fink!
triplecheck4 3 weeks ago
Read the Top 200 lies by Chomsky and also google Chosmsky Hoax. Chomsky is a useful idiot!
triplecheck4 3 weeks ago
@wildlettuce What regulations could settle disputes quicker and more effectively? States give validity to ICC, but then turn on the whole process when someone calls them out. It's not a question of defense BTW. It has to do with agreed upon treaties/resolutions on 5/4 key issues. But let's end the discussion here.. It will be hard for me to keep up in this form. If you could PM with a response it would make it easier for me to respond to at a later time.
Alpinex105 3 weeks ago
@wildlettuce Does it mean Israel/USA are justified?
Alpinex105 3 weeks ago
@wildlettuce I agree. There are many problems with International Law, however States interestingly enough use the institution regularly. Keep in mind States infringe not just Int Law, but own state laws. America uses the term sovereignty like China, France, Russia and UK to get away with abiding by laws however, ask yourself if the conclusions are just "based on domestic policies/laws and your values".
Alpinex105 3 weeks ago
@Alpinex105 as i said, i dont think democracy is the ultimate solution, but it have to do until we find something better.
the problem the international law is that its not clear who should/does abide by it, whether there's anyone actually enforcing it, and what are the 'punishments'.
when china invades another country (tibet) for expansion purposes, occupies it & burns the local culture, intl law doesnt exist. but when israel defends itself all of the sudden intl law is very clear.
wildlettuce 3 weeks ago
@wildlettuce than you know. There isn't a single voice, but their can be a majority. This is crucial to democracy.
Alpinex105 3 weeks ago