Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

M2TW - Knight templar VS Knight hospitaller

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,528
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 10, 2008

Who will win?

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Hospitaller were best fighting force in world

  • Hospitallers and templars were ( friends ) but there was a battle in egypt between the knighthoods. Interesting fact is that many of the templars joined ranks with the hospitallers (knights of Malta) when the templars were destroyed by the knig of france.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • whoever said the hospitallers are better are talking crap the templars where. I'm currently studying history and the templars where holy monks trained in warfare to protect christian pilgrims in the holy land, they where feared by the Muslims and hated as they believed holy men shouldn't fight. The hospitallers where knights who wore the hospitallers cross to gain a higher prestige when on crusade and in fact weren't actually that religious and that's why they no longer exist.

  • @theirishnation2k10 I am pretty sure that most of today's special forces actually WOULD survive the training, at least the toughest guys. What is a fair fight? No equipment? If so, I am very sure that Spartans would win, but that is not a surprise. After all, today's special forces are trained very, very differently than Spartans were, that is why in my opinion it is impossible to compare special forces to Spartans. Spartans couldn't do para jumps for example ;)

  • @FatalJoymonkey1337 obviously not, spartans would not be able to stand against the SAS whilst they where using their firearms and fire support. In terms of training and pure skill the spartans excell at that. They trained from the age they could walk to be warriors. The hospitallers trained from the age of 12. The SAS from around late Twenties, Early Thirties. Most men Rangers, Seals, SAS and Spetznaz alike would not survive the training endured by the Spartans. In a fair fight, Spartans win.

  • @theirishnation2k10 Are you implying that 24 Spartans would beat 24 SAS operatives in a fight, where they both use their own equipment? ;)

  • they are equal in the game, and they were friends...i love both of them, but in this case what matter is unit position, luck, and charge. as they have the same stats in game :)

  • @ParadigmShiftr are you talking about the 1099 jerusalem massacre ? if so u might wanna know that no knight orders ever existed until the time after the first crusade

  • NO MORE BROTHER WARS

    all Hospitallers,Templars,Teutonic­s,Crusaders Untited AGANIST

    the Seljuq Islamic Barbaric Horde !!!!

  • To all the Dipshits down there ¥ how are posting stupid comments like

    "the hospitallers were the best fighting force in the world"

    Shut up the Spartans were and still are today

    "the hospitallers were better than the Templars"

    Wrong again the hospitallers were mainly and firstly dictors who after the huge boom both economically and in size within the Knights Templars followed suit and started becoming nights securing trade links and estates to try to keep up with the Templars

  • @UclaBruins22x What if Templars were better? How can you know?

  • @redfan45x They didn't massacre everyone in Jerusalem, you ignorant moron.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more