蘋果日報 - 20110707 - 抄牌對峙 婦拿鉸剪警拔槍非常夫婦涉襲警被捕

【本報訊】一宗普通交通違例抄牌事件，演變成警員拔槍與手持鉸剪事主對峙局面。一名交通警員昨午在灣仔截停一輛七人車，準備檢控司機沒有扣安全帶，以及涉嫌在行車期間收看 DVD。男女事主情緒激動與警員爭吵，其間警員見女事主拿起鉸剪，立即拔槍警告，事主報警，大批警員趕至調查，其後以涉嫌襲警罪名將男女事主拘捕，警員拔槍事件則交由重案­組跟進。
記者：徐雲庭、潘柏林、鄭大康

昨午約 4時 50分， 45歲從事園藝工作的姓鄭事主，駕駛七人車載着 37歲姓杜妻子沿灣仔夏道行駛，至接近演藝道時，一名交警駕電單車駛近指示鄭將車駛入演藝道接受調查，鄭將車泊在紅十字會總部對開。
駐守跑馬地警署、當差 15年的姓李警員指鄭沒有佩戴安全帶，其間又見司機位前的錶板位置安裝的 DVD正在開着，於是加控使用不合規格車輛罪，夫婦聞言大為激動，兩人下車與警員理論，其間鄭拿出 iPhone手機，一邊與警員理論、一邊拍下經過。

男事主拍下拔槍情況
其間，李見一直情緒激動的鄭妻突然衝回七人車，從乘客位俯身入車廂取出一柄 12吋長的鉸剪，李大為緊張，即從司機位俯身入內，一手捉住鄭妻握着鉸剪的手，兩人角力；此時，男事主衝前護妻，一手將警員推開。
李被推開後即拔出佩槍，指着車廂內的鄭妻大喝：「放低把鉸剪！」鄭妻大驚將鉸剪放下，然後走出車廂與丈夫一同指罵警員，男事主用手機拍下拔槍情況，鄭妻大罵：「你係咪癲 o架！係咪黐線 o架！」這時候，警員將佩槍收回槍袋內，改而拔出警棍，對拿着手機的男女事主喝令：「你唔好過嚟呀，我用警棍 o架！」
事主未被嚇退繼續逼向警員：「你係咪黐 o架！我影低咗！」男事主又着妻子報警，並在電話中向 999電台說：「有個差人揸住支槍指住我呀！」警員則用無線電向上級報告：「我拔咗槍呀！」
附近一名交警趕至，男事主見有警員出現，即大叫：「你伙記神經 o架，佢揸住支槍對住我呀！」男事主一面指罵拔槍警員，一面拿着手機逼近，警員再警告：「你唔好過嚟呀，我用警棍 o架！」事主則步步進逼：「扑我吖、扑我吖」，最後被其他警員勸開。
稱妻子執拾園藝工具

鄭事後解釋，妻子只是探身車內執拾園藝工具，並非襲警。警方指警員口頭警告無效始拔槍戒備，調查後暫以涉嫌「襲警」及「藏有攻擊性武器」罪將兩人帶署調查。拔槍警報稱左手­受傷兼頭暈送院。
來源：http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20110707&...­_id=4104&subsec_id=11867&art_id=15409044

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 蘋果
• 日報
• 2011
• 07
• 抄牌
• 對峙
• 婦拿
• 鉸剪
• 警
• 拔槍
• 夫婦
• 襲警
• 被捕
• 交通
• 違例
• 演變
• 警員
• 手持
• 事主
• 灣仔
• 七人車
• 檢控
• 司機
• 扣
• 安全帶
• 行車
• DVD
• 情緒
• 激動
• 爭吵
• 警告
• 報警
• 調查
• 拘捕
• 重案組
• 香港
• 交通警
• 鐵馬
• 燥狂
• 魔警
• 徐步高

[cscan97]

本人對此案分析如下：

乘客位俯身入車廂 <- 打呢場官司，就最重要呢個動作的意圖。夫婦搵定律師啦，未必有律­師肯接，我估警方會用「意圖襲警」罪告佢地，而且入硬！

 男事主一手推開警員 <- 意圖是否只分開兩人，還是想制服警員令妻子可成功提取武器，呢個­point有得打。

警員拔槍可能怕事主飛鉸剪，所以選擇唔用警棍，報告好易寫，上C­ourt都可以咁講，另外警員可感覺事主情緒失控下會做出任何攻­擊行為，及兩事主一前一後埋身，警員可以懷疑男事主奪槍，也不清­楚男事主有沒有別的武器，情急下，雖然拔槍會令事主，也要退幾步­遠離兩事主及拔槍自保。

[uame100]

個警察完全係自我保護，大家睇下成段片個警察只係向一個方向行，­就係向後。。。申出一隻手示意叫佢地停止接近。。。但佢地完全係­得寸進呎，仲隊部ＩＰＨＯＮＥ去人地塊面度。。。真係。。。。。­。



[friensddogdog]

講真,真係個差佬on9啫!

如果佢覺得個女人真係想攞武器隊佢既,

佢唔應該向前制止,應該退後先岩!

因為咁先可以睇清楚個女人下一步想點!

都未搞清個女人想點就行動,

咁就一定有磨擦架啦!

[friensddogdog]

@newstvb 同意!!

[kchung9209]

I do not want to second guess anyone but why do the female feel the need to get out a pair of scissor during a traffic stop....could she not do that AFTER the officer leave. Secondly, I think the officer kind of over reacted. If the female was still in the vehicle with the scissor, WHY enter the vehicle to get the scissor. If she exited the vehicle with the scissor, then I too would pull out my gun for protection.

[kchung9209]

It is funny how some people whom after watching this video stated that the couple got shot at by the police officer......For those of u who do not understand cantonese, the couple were not shot at....the officer only pulled out his gun. From what i got, the officer sees the female in the vehicle with a pair of scissor. As the officer attempts to take the scissor away, the husband grabs officer and pushes him away. Officer then pull out gun.

[ChickonSoup]

@timtsan2011 how about this, try to be an officer before you call someone "another evil deepshit", having low casualty rate means the job is not dangerous? I think the danger an officer has to face in a week will be more than what you will see in your whole pathetic life.

it clearly shows that this couple is simply challenging the law enforcement's limits, they should be happy that they're in HK, cuz in any western countries they will be shot no further questions asked.

[timtsan2011]

@ChickonSoup Another Evil deepshit, couple is wrong but dont deserve to get shoot. I am sure HK police is not as corrupt as the Philippines but using excessive force may happen! Do you really think the police are facing alot of danger everyday? If so you'll need to look at the statistics, there are many other occupations have a higher casuality rate than the police force i.e. construction worker who may earn only a fraction of police pay. Cant imagine u can be a fair & good police officer!

[stonpio]

@timtsan2011 Please read all news from printed media related to this story before making further comments. The video only showed part of the story. The crucial part of this story, due to the police investigation, is not allowed to be online. And this is the internet, you don't need to argue with strangers. So let's stop here.

[stonpio]

@timtsan2011 I don't live in USA. I live in a very peaceful country of which licensing of firearms are strictly controlled. Or at lease I've never seen anyone using firearms except police officers. My judgment on this couple is not only from this video, but from printed media related to this story. The video only showed part of the story. The ticket was given out to the couple before the argument but the couple refused to obey the officer. The officer only get into the car to stop the woman.

[stonpio]

@timtsan2011 I've never thought the couple should be shot legally. I only said 'if it happened in the USA they should have died already'. Everyone get paid to carry out their works, including you, I believed. Your contributions to your country is not only to pay police officers' salary, but your social & medical welfare, education, etc. So if you wanted to make a say for your government to review, I guess you should make it to the representatives of your district. I can't see your logic.

[timtsan2011]

@stonpio That is why there is so much violent in USA, because people like you look so lightly on the use of firearms. This couple is wrong but doesn't deserve to be shoot at. The story said 'the woman drop out / show a pair of scissors inside the car', I can't see why the police officer need to be in the car for giving out a ticket in the first place. I can only see the police put out a gun at a situation that I would say not very high risk, plus he is got other weapon he can use, i.e. batton.