Collapse Of Evolution [Theory Of Evolution Debunked] Evolution vs Creationism Part 1/7

Collapse Of Evolution [Theory Of Evolution Debunked] Part 1. Charles Darwin's Theory Of Evolution Flawed by Modern Science and Technology. Evolution vs Creationism

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• collapse
• of
• evolution
• theory
• debunked
• wrong
• charles
• darwin
• mistake
• Evolution
• vs
• Creationism

[dlandon2000]

Miller-Urey experiment provided evidence for Abiogenesis. It had nothing to do with evolution.

Yes the conditions they used probably are not what was found on earth then, but many other experiments with other early life conditions have been run and they too have produced amino acids simply from chemical reactions.

[SuxorAoeBj]

This video is not made to sway who has any scientific understanding. Five minutes into the video, there has been nothing but baseless assertions, and deceptive misrepresentations. For example, to decribe evolution as the result "processes governed entirely by chance," is not only deceptive, it is an intentional untruth. Natural selection is governed by anything but chance.

[larry43062]

Back in Darwin's day people believed the OT was real and not a myth. Today 100% of all DNA supports Darwin's Proven hypothesis of Evolution. But there are still witch burners in this day and age that spout pure crap like this. Which makes them immoral lying creeps.

[scievryday]

Here is a fun game, lets count the fallacies.

1 fallacy, 2 fallacies, 3 fallacies, 4 fal… aww this game sucks lets play hungry hungry hippos

[Batters56]

I thought he was going to say "Space, the final frontier..." at the start.

[Quartrez]

@malechauvinistxy What a well thought argument.

[malechauvinistxy]

@dlandon2000 this is what you do with your boyfriend!!!

/watch?v=jjnrLt3VuSM

[dlandon2000]

@malechauvinistxy "SUCK ON MY WIENER LOSERS"

Wow, is that your attempt at honest research? Doing exactly what I said NOT to do? Ask a creationist... pathetic. If you wanted someone to learn about christianity would you sent them to a muslim imam? Of course not they'll get distorted and biased information. That's all you get from creationists, biased misinformation or outright lies (including the video you sent).

PLEASE do some HONEST research first. Take some science classes about geology.

[malechauvinistxy]

@dlandon2000 SUCK ON MY WIENER LOSERS..HAHHAHAHA

/watch?v=gDQHGotojGM

[dlandon2000]

@malechauvinistxy Could be another reason, but the BB explains all our data extremely well. Any new idea would have to do as well or better. I specified the predictions and data in my last post. Math is far to complicated to do in 500 characters.

Some radiometric dating requires knowledge of the initial mix, some don't. Sometimes you have ways of knowing the initial mix. Do some honest research into it. Learn it from scientists not creationists. It's fully consistent and compelling.

[malechauvinistxy]

@dlandon2000 could there be another reason for the CBR??..and what was the predictions?..what calculations did they use?

and radiometric dating again makes assumptions..it assumes you know the ratios of radioactive isotopes in the enviroment when the rock is formed..so the initial dating is based on an assumtion, thus redering all dates invalid.