Creation Research Society Microscopy laboratory

Support www.Creationresearch.org! Hundreds of real scientists doing real science that honors our Creator.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Creationist
• creationism
• science
• Biblical science

[MarkHArmitage]

Not sure who to address this to...maybe "HEY OLD EARTH EVOLUTIONISTS"? Anyway, what does it matter when the impacts occurred? They obviously happened. The old-age dilemma is the fact that radiohalos and zircons show the earth is young and formed suddenly. Google iscpubs deep core zircons.

[irkulyen]

Found your abstract Mark, not on the websites of the prestigious institutions you mentioned, but on a website called "Creation Ministries International," not exactly a scientifically rigorous outfit huh? There, I read of one Russell Humphries, described by the oxymoron "creation physicist" and the author of your elusive abstract. He's in the "god done it all school" of young earth creationism. Not taken seriously anywhere. I therefore conclude that your arguments are not worthy of refutation.

[MarkHArmitage]

Dear Irky, Parking a $200k Ferrari in a Yugo warehouse does not diminish the staggering complexity and raw performance of the Ferrari. Your lame argument that the helium work is found on a creationist website (among many others including secular) diminishes the logic and science of the paper is a ploy often thrown up by ignorant persons such as yourself. Ignorance is a choice and you are free to remain ignorant and not look at the facts for yourself.

[MarkHArmitage]

You show your lack of skills by not finding creationist articles in secular journals. Mine were published over the last 15 years in SoCal Academy of Sciences and others. Also you throw up straw men with sophomoric comments: "god got it all done school". Could you behave less like a first grader? "Teacher, teacher - his drawing is in the lunch room - it does'nt count". Drop your mental diapers Irky and learn get yourself logically potty trained. Argue the data, big mouth - don't call names.

[Justwantahover]

HEY YOUNG EARTH CREATIONISTS! I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU? There is an impact crater 200 km diam and one 500km diam! They are proven to be impacts by irridium (a rare substance) around the rim and tectites (glass 'marbles') around the rim (tectites don't form volcanically). Did impacts that large happen within 6000yrs? Some greationist say they happened in the flood but others say it changes the flood too much and simply deny the ipacts (except the smallest). Can you explain this?

[drakkas72]

I really enjoy how irate and on the offensive people get when anything mentioning creation is talked about. Evolution although widespread is still a theory, a scientific theory albeit, still a theory that has not been proven, nor disproven. If all of you that are so against creation research would actually take the time and do some "real" fact finding you may be amazed. You talk Dawkins, he is as arrogant and narrow minded as you all. Smart as heck, but still. Check out Michael Behe.

[irkulyen]

Well Mark, I've enjoyed our little chats but I must be getting back to my favorite atheist writers. They may not believe in God, but they have a slightly more uplifted vision of human nature and destiny then all the ID folks out there put together. I will give you guys credit for persistence though. No matter how many court cases you lose or how often you are proven wrong, you keep coming back for another drubbing. After 2000 years of Christian mischief however, the human is race is moving on.

[irkulyen]

If by "facts" you mean fairy tales from the Bible, I think I'll stick to my Darwin thank you. However hard you try, you cannot make Genesis scientifically valid, no matter how many microscopes you own. And some of your creationist buddies are now making ludicrous claims against modern astronomy, saying that the Milky Way Galaxy is the center of the universe because that's where God meant His children to be. You don't believe THAT do you?. So I repeat, your arguments are not worthy of refutation.

[irkulyen]

Hi Mark! - I have searched in vain for the abstract you have sited, on both the web sites of the American Geophysical Union and the Harvard University Library, specifically, the Hollis database. In all cases, I got a "no results found" message. Perhaps you would care to be a bit more specific, i.e. an actual abstract title, plus author and publication date. But I must say, a mere single peer reviewed article in seven years does not speak very highly of your standing in the academic world.

[MarkHArmitage]

@irkulyen Mr. Irk - or whatever your fake name is....I will give you just one peer reviewed journal, since you are in mental diapers...American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2003, abstract #V32C-1047. It is posted on the Harvard.edu website.

Put up or shut up :-)