Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Richard Bandler Interview by Ronald Amsler 3/4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,420
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 18, 2009

Richard Bandler Interview by Ronald Amsler 3/4

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Unlike John Grinder, Richard Bandler keeps NLP simple (elegant) rather than complicated.

    I think RB may be more of a genius than even Einstein because of his study of the structure of subjectivity.

  • Thanks for uploading this!!!

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Niglo45 bandler is such a fat bloated crock of shit. he has a bad history. he was accused of murder (it's true; look it up). Some nlp is good. I have written a book on it, but the rest is cult rubbish of which I won't mingle nor waste my time.

  • @JiggaNiggaFigga nice name

  • @sreeshankarlal1 it means he's got an ichy eye

  • What does Richard rubbing the eyes frequently subconsciously mean?

  • @appolo08 Science is about knowledge which can be applied and the theories are tested. NLP is also about theories (look up what a theory is). I would argue that the tools that do work (and i have been using NLP for years and am aware of what works and to what extent) are similar to a lot of evidence based tools from other disciplines. Bandler gets a lot wrong yet makes a lot of money, he overgeneralises with science, we know certain things are less effected yet he tars it all with the same brush

  • @whicheverwayable As long as people keep trying to define NLP as science, NLP will always resemble pseudoscience. NLP is best defined as a behavioral technology rather than a science because science is about theorizing whereas a technology is about application. NLP was developed by modeling experts then drawing from other fields (such as linguistics, cybernetics, etc) to formalize the experts' behavioral and linguistic patterns.

  • @appolo08 Believe me, this guy is not a genius but actually a conman using pseudoscientific jargon to make money. What works in NLP already exists in the science that Bandler disdains (incl cognitive psychology, neuroscience & linguistics which NLP doesn't follow). It's worrying that people refer to this man as a genius, when much of what he says about science is manipulated, biased and just plain nonsense in order for him to make money. NLP tools do work but can be explained better by science.

  • This guy is bigger than life!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more