Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

911 Smoking Gun: South Tower Nano-Thermite in Action

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,500
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 26, 2009

Nano Thermite from the south tower reacting in mid-air.
This video is from http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth
Please subscribe!

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • yep, 911 inside job.

  • blast squib alert at the bottom on 1:36

see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • try inverting the video colors and watch it

  • try iveft

  • The world trade towers fell due from the incredible damage done from the two planes. However, building seven imploded. More than 1,500 scientists, engineers and demolition experts agree on this assessment. As for the argument that building seven had a "massive scoop torn out.. it rings hollow. Tim McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma City did far worse damage and that building didn't fall down.

  • @user6008 Note also that wtc7 had a massive scoop torn out of the front by falling debris. You don't see that in pictures or video as it's obscured by smoke but there are several corroborating eye-witness reports on it. It wasn't 'just' fire that brought wtc7 down, it was fire + extreme structural damage that was observed by hundreds of people with no reason to lie.

  • @user6008 What other skyscrapers in modern history have been hit by a 400,000 pound airliner carrying 20,000 gallons of jet fuel flying on a direct course at it's maximum, throttle open velocity?

    any data on that anywhere?

  • More half-baked analysis from people with no credentials.

    That piece of debris changed paths and smoke followed it! Obviously nano-thermite rather than a non-uniform, burning piece of debris in the midst of a massive eddy of unnatural air current!

    Stuff accelerated faster towards the ground! It must be nano-thermite rather than aerodynamics!

    Obviously the government has paid off all of the credentialed physicists that would support this theory so that you're a lone voice in the dark.

  • No skyscraper in modern history has collapsed due to fire before or after September 11th 2001. So follow the thinking, if building 7 was a preplanned demolition, it was done so in conjunction with the destruction of the twin towers. Which then begs the question, what else besides two planes brought down the twin world trade towers?

  • Deny Ignorance. Thank you 911infowarrior.

  • @Rangerbelt And do you know that the building was built to withstand several jet impacts? As to "intense heat" whaa? It you want to know what intense heat is, go to a smelting plant. Also, please explain how the buildings directly adjacent to WTC 1&2 took the impact of those buildings + fires and yet they still stood yet WTC 7 was blocks away but reduced to nothing in the same fashion as WTC 1&2.

  • hmmm...an inside job aye? Maybe the collapse was cause by global warming? You people crack me up!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more