Crysis Photo-realistic Map
Uploader Comments (glyoxal)
Top Comments
-
@prokentsful : think before commenting.. this video is two and half years old. youtube had no hd support at that time
-
@xXFR05TXx that's too much RAM, forcus on a better graphics card, maybe 2x 6870's
All Comments (314)
-
@bladefinor thats weird coz there a videos uploaded in 2007 with HD :\
-
@JoostRevo It's okay lol. Btw, I meant Adelis' comment, not glyoxal.
-
@bladefinor Oh, Didnt see that comment. lol, sorry
-
@JoostRevo I know... I just corrected what glyoxal's said. It didn't come out in the end of 2007, but in the end of 2008.
-
@bladefinor November ... Look at the date my friend.
-
@XxAdeliOxX Taken from Wikipedia: "In November 2008, 720p HD support was added..."
-
@glyoxal HD support came out at the end of 2007
-
@glyoxal I DONT THINK BF 3 WAS COMEING OUT AT THAT TIME!
-
@Jaeger2011 screw you mr. smartass
-
@tomce4909 get a brain stupid.
I think it would be nice if someone makes an avatar-like map with CryEngine 2. Yep, 2, not three. I know it would be extremely hard but it's absolutely possible. It would be amazing!!
Cigaraholic 9 months ago
@Cigaraholic :cryengine3 goes down the drain..atleast when compared to cryengine2
glyoxal 9 months ago
@glyoxal They just announced the release of mod tools for Cryengine 3. Wait and see, it might actually be somewhat good. Cryengine 2 isn't as efficient as the new Crytek engine so making a decision without knowing all the facts, its a little too early in my book at least.
Seirra54 9 months ago
@Seirra54 : It is a fact that cryengine 2 is way better than 3. anybody who played both games on pc at max settings will say the same thing. Crysis came with a cryengine 2 editor in itself. So its no big deal!
glyoxal 9 months ago