Forgive me for an additional post! I couldn't resist! Has Sam Harris ever applied the scientific method to the official conspiracy theory of 9/11? How do the realms of 'real science' interpret the official 9/11 fairy story of how the WTC buildings fell symmetrically at the speed of gravity?
His obvious failure to do so, makes the entire premise of his argument against 'religion' completely bogus.There is no scientific empirical evidence that Muslim driven planes brought down the WTC1,2 + WTC7
Poor Sam Harris, who demands evidence and empiricism to prove the 'assertion of God', yet, the U.S. government is bereft of empirical evidence that 'radical religious Muslims' flew planes into the World Trade Center on 9/11/01. So, the whole premise of his 'awakening' is unfounded by his own paradigm of measuring veracity. Is Sam's gullible belief in the information the Bush administration dictated to the mass media a 'functional certainty'?
Forgive me for an additional post! I couldn't resist! Has Sam Harris ever applied the scientific method to the official conspiracy theory of 9/11? How do the realms of 'real science' interpret the official 9/11 fairy story of how the WTC buildings fell symmetrically at the speed of gravity?
His obvious failure to do so, makes the entire premise of his argument against 'religion' completely bogus.There is no scientific empirical evidence that Muslim driven planes brought down the WTC1,2 + WTC7
RefutingSkellyism 1 month ago
Poor Sam Harris, who demands evidence and empiricism to prove the 'assertion of God', yet, the U.S. government is bereft of empirical evidence that 'radical religious Muslims' flew planes into the World Trade Center on 9/11/01. So, the whole premise of his 'awakening' is unfounded by his own paradigm of measuring veracity. Is Sam's gullible belief in the information the Bush administration dictated to the mass media a 'functional certainty'?
Can you say; "Hypocrite!"?
RefutingSkellyism 1 month ago